Different Naming Systems in Textbooks: IUPAC Standards

Virogen
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I have encountered different naming systems in textbooks.

Ignoring cis/trans, for example, some textbooks would give the name 2-butene, while others give but-2-ene.

Are they both acceptable? The newer textbook uses the second type of naming, while the older textbook uses the first. Have the IUPAC standards changed?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
How odd, the IB program seems to be using the older system...
 
Different countries also have different systems. But generally they are both accepted.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
16K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
12K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K