Different ways to check the answers

  • Thread starter Thread starter rootX
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Different methods to verify solutions for simple resistive circuits include thorough documentation of each step in the analysis process, particularly when using Nodal and Mesh Analysis. It's important to simplify equations before calculation and to double-check the numbers used, ensuring that equations align with the solutions obtained. Confirming that the directions of currents match the circuit diagram is crucial. If time allows, employing alternative techniques to cross-check results can enhance accuracy. Additionally, conducting a power analysis can provide further validation of the solutions.
rootX
Messages
478
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


What are different ways to check your solutions for simple Resistive Circuits?
Or even in general cases, how I can make sure that my answer is right?

I am making very stupid mistakes (mostly algebra problems and using wrong directions),
so I want to make sure that I don't repeat these mistakes in the exam.
I am not very familiar with circuits, so I cannot use reality check (in Physics, it's very simple to guess the answer even without doing detailed calculations)

Homework Equations


I am using Nodal Analysis and Mesh Analysis to solve them

The Attempt at a Solution



Here's a checklist I developed:
# Reviewing Nodal Analysis Questions:

1. I should write detailed steps (neatly) leaving space between lines
2. I should simplify my equations before solving them on calculator
3. After Calculations:
1. See if I have used right numbers
2. See if my equations are right
3. See if my solutions meet with my equations
* See if I have right directions of currents as indicated by diagram
4. If time available, use other techniques to confirm my answers
5. See if power analysis agree...

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top