Differential geometry hypersurface problem - starting

quasar_4
Messages
273
Reaction score
0
differential geometry hypersurface problem - need help starting!

1. Homework Statement [/b

Let f\in C^{\infty}(R\R^{2}) and let S be the set of points in R\R^{3} given the graph of f. Thus, s={{(x,y,z=f(x,y))|(x,y)\inR\R^{2}}.

a) Show that this set of points can be viewed as a regular level surface.

b) Let X=(x,y,z) be a point on this surface. Find a basis for the tangent space TxS.

c) Give a cover for this surface.

Homework Equations



Ehm. Not really "equations", per se. We will need the coordinate basis for R3 which is \partialx, \partialy, \partialz.

The Attempt at a Solution



I am soo, so confused. I guess our F=f(x,y). To show that something is a regular level surface, I believe that we have to show that not all partial derivatives vanish at the point x on the surface. If we had an actual f(x,y) I would compute F*, the differential, and show that it is not simultaneously 0 at some point x on the surface. But, we don't have an explicit f(x,y). So I have no idea how to show this, or to show equivalently, the the mapping from TxU (for our open set U) to T_{F(x)}S is surjective.

I am TOTALLY lost as to how to come up with a basis. It seems that we should compute the kernel of F* and its basis, but I'm not clear on what we do with this basis.

If I could figure out parts a and b, I MIGHT be able to figure out part c. I know that a cover is the union of surface patches. But then I'd have to start by making coordinate surface patches first... would I be defining some map or something??

I'm terribly confused. If anyone can help that would be marvelous!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
quasar_4 said:
1. Homework Statement [/b

Let f\in C^{\infty}(R\R^{2}) and let S be the set of points in R\R^{3} given the graph of f. Thus, s={{(x,y,z=f(x,y))|(x,y)\inR\R^{2}}.

a) Show that this set of points can be viewed as a regular level surface.

b) Let X=(x,y,z) be a point on this surface. Find a basis for the tangent space TxS.

c) Give a cover for this surface.

Homework Equations



Ehm. Not really "equations", per se. We will need the coordinate basis for R3 which is \partialx, \partialy, \partialz.

The Attempt at a Solution



I am soo, so confused. I guess our F=f(x,y).

No. A "level curve" for a function f(x,y) would be a curve in the xy-plane. In order that a surface in 3 dimensions be a level surface, it must be of the form F(x,y,z)= constant. In this case, given z= f(x,y), you know that z-f(x,y)= 0.

To show that something is a regular level surface, I believe that we have to show that not all partial derivatives vanish at the point x on the surface. If we had an actual f(x,y) I would compute F*, the differential, and show that it is not simultaneously 0 at some point x on the surface. But, we don't have an explicit f(x,y). So I have no idea how to show this, or to show equivalently, the the mapping from TxU (for our open set U) to T_{F(x)}S is surjective.
What can you say about the partial derivatives of z-f(x,y)?

I am TOTALLY lost as to how to come up with a basis. It seems that we should compute the kernel of F* and its basis, but I'm not clear on what we do with this basis.
Given that the surface is defined by z= f(x,y), any tangent vector is of the form \vec{i}+ f_x\vec{k} or \vec{i}+ f_y\vec{k}[/itex].<br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> If I could figure out parts a and b, I MIGHT be able to figure out part c. I know that a cover is the union of surface patches. But then I&#039;d have to start by making coordinate surface patches first... would I be defining some map or something??<br /> <br /> I&#039;m terribly confused. If anyone can help that would be marvelous! </div> </div> </blockquote>
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top