Differential Signaling for High-Speed Digital Transmission by Jason O

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jdo300
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differential
AI Thread Summary
Jason O is seeking advice on transmitting a 5V square wave signal at up to 3MHz between two boards located 5-6 inches apart, considering the use of a digital isolator (IL610). He initially thought of a single-ended signal but is leaning towards differential signaling for better noise immunity, using twisted-pair wire. Experts suggest that for this short distance, transmission line effects are minimal, and termination may not be necessary, although a 300-ohm termination could be considered. They also recommend exploring RS-485 as a potential differential driver, confirming that the isolators can handle high speeds. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the effectiveness of differential signaling and the suitability of twisted-pair wiring for this application.
Jdo300
Messages
548
Reaction score
5
Hello All,

I have a board that needs to send a high-speed digital signal to a second board about 5-6 inches away. The signal itself is just a 5V square wave with a variable pulse width and frequency that could go as high as 3MHz. The second board has an isolated supply and I plan to route the signal to it using a digital isolator (IL610 to be exact). I was first thinking about driving the signal single-ended, but then thought about using a differential signal since I heard that it has much better noise immunity.

The isolator is located on the destination board and I was thinking about using some kind of line driver (differential line driver?) to drive the signal through some twisted-pair wire to the second board. My question is do I need to be concerned about transmission line effects when transmitting in differential mode? does there need to be a termination of some kind like in a single-ended setup or something different?

Thanks,
Jason O
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Twisted-pair wire is a excellent way to do it. You can make a differential driver yourself by using an inverter for the second line. When one switches up, the other one switches down, and vice-versa. The noise immunity comes from having a good differential receiver.

For 6 inches of wire in the air, that's about 0.5 nanoseconds of flight time (0.5 x 10e-9 seconds). For wire in air, signals travel pretty close to the speed of light, about 85ps of flight time per inch.

A 3MHz signal has a half-cycle time of 167ns. That means you probably don't have to worry about reflections too much, and shouldn't have to worry about terminating the wiring. If you did want to terminate, probably around 300 ohms (on each side) might work, I think that's about what twisted wire comes close to.

When the waveform switches, the reflections will bounce back and forth every 1ns (counting up and down), and die down pretty quick. You still have 166ns before the waveform will switch again, so it's not a big deal. You usually only have to worry about transmission line effects if the line is long enough so that the reflection time approaches the waveform time.
 
Jdo300 said:
Hello All,

I have a board that needs to send a high-speed digital signal to a second board about 5-6 inches away. The signal itself is just a 5V square wave with a variable pulse width and frequency that could go as high as 3MHz. The second board has an isolated supply and I plan to route the signal to it using a digital isolator (IL610 to be exact). I was first thinking about driving the signal single-ended, but then thought about using a differential signal since I heard that it has much better noise immunity.

The isolator is located on the destination board and I was thinking about using some kind of line driver (differential line driver?) to drive the signal through some twisted-pair wire to the second board. My question is do I need to be concerned about transmission line effects when transmitting in differential mode? does there need to be a termination of some kind like in a single-ended setup or something different?

Thanks,
Jason O


I think RS-485 may work for that frequency at that short distance. Use Cat-5 cable, and forward terminate with 105 Ohms at the RS-485 receiver input. Double-check the RS-485 chip specs (like from Maxim) to see if they go that fast.

BTW, does your isolator really work to 3MHz?
 
Jdo300 said:
Hi Everyone,

Thanks for your help with this. I'll definitely look into the RS-485 IC for a possible differential driver.

@Berkeman,

Yes the Isolators I'm using (IL610 or IL710) can both go over 100Mbps. These aren't like regular isolators. Here's a link to the dataheets:

http://www.nve.com/Downloads/il600.pdf

http://www.nve.com/isopdf/il710.pdf

Wow, fascinating devices. Thanks for the links, Jason. Interesting that they already have about 85 Ohms for the input coil -- would have been nice if it were closer to the 100 Ohms of Cat-5 cable, though.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...

Similar threads

Back
Top