Differentiating like vs. opposite charges

TEFLing
Messages
237
Reaction score
22
Can experiments differentiate like vs. opposite charges?

Two electrons repel, whereas an electron and positron attract. But for macroscopic observers, in the absence of annihilation, could anyone tell whether paths deflected due to attractions or repulsion? Or, is there always annihilation?

Anyway, I'd like to know, whether experiments could discern whether neutrinos and antineutrinos have like or opposite weak force hypercharge, due to the way they scatter from each other... I guess if there was evidence of annihilation events then they would be proven to be different and anti particles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TEFLing said:
But for macroscopic observers, in the absence of annihilation, could anyone tell whether paths deflected due to attractions or repulsion?
Sure? If they accelerate towards each other they are attracted, if they accelerate away from each other they are repelled.
TEFLing said:
Or, is there always annihilation?
No.
TEFLing said:
Anyway, I'd like to know, whether experiments could discern whether neutrinos and antineutrinos have like or opposite weak force hypercharge, due to the way they scatter from each other
There is no realistic way to measure (or even get) neutrino-neutrino scattering. And the weak hypercharge does not work in the same way the electric charge does.

TEFLing said:
I guess if there was evidence of annihilation events then they would be proven to be different and anti particles?
I don't see why annihilation should prove that. Also, annihilation to what?
 
mfb said:
I don't see why annihilation should prove that. Also, annihilation to what?
Only anti particles can annihilate?

Perhaps they would have to annihilate to neutral Z0 "hyper photons"... ? And perhaps the 90 GeV energy of the Z0 would suppress annihilation events to near impossibility? If so then neutrinos and antineutrinos would be energetically unable to annihilate and could only scatter?

If they could annihilate through a virtual Z0 to photons , they would produce photons of a few eV, visible light to UV??
 
TEFLing said:
Only anti particles can annihilate?
With what? Annihilation is a process that needs two particles.
The designation "antiparticle" is completely arbitrary, we could call all antiparticles particles and all particles antiparticles without changing physics.

TEFLing said:
And perhaps the 90 GeV energy of the Z0 would suppress annihilation events to near impossibility? If so then neutrinos and antineutrinos would be energetically unable to annihilate and could only scatter?
The high mass of W and Z bosons makes the process even less likely, right. Annihilation to photons would give photons with an energy similar to the initial neutrino energy.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
35
Views
8K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
36
Views
6K
Back
Top