Differentiation woes with temperature/entropy relations.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the temperature of a black hole using its entropy and energy relations. The entropy formula provided leads to a temperature expression that suggests an inverse relationship between energy and temperature, which raises confusion. It is noted that as a black hole gains energy, it expands, resulting in a cooling effect that dominates, explaining why larger black holes are stable while smaller ones evaporate quickly. The participant expresses uncertainty about the correctness of their calculations, especially when using different approaches that yield negative temperatures. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexities of black hole thermodynamics and the counterintuitive nature of temperature and energy relationships in this context.
EricVT
Messages
165
Reaction score
6
Alright, this is probably a really redundant question but for some reason it is giving me trouble. Let's say you are given the entropy of a black hole as:

S=\frac{8\pi^2GM^2k}{hc} (thanks Stephen Hawking)

And you have the relation between temperature and entropy/energy

\frac{1}{T}= \frac{\partial S}{\partial U} (U is energy, S is entropy)

Now if you want an expression for the temperature of a black hole in terms of it's mass and you are using U = Mc^2, then should you rewrite:

M^2 = \frac{U^2}{c^4}

S = \frac{8\pi^2GkU^2}{hc^5}

And then differentiate with respect to U to get:

\frac{1}{T} = \frac{16\pi^2GkU}{hc^5}

T = \frac{hc^5}{16\pi^2GkU}

First of all, as the ENERGY increases the TEMPERATURE decreases? Is this really possible here? I'm confused by this. Finishing the problem, though, and rewriting U = Mc^2 gives:

T = \frac{hc^3}{16\pi^2GkM}

Does this seem correct? I tried working the problem a different way by writing c in terms of U as well at the start, and differentiating that expression and got a completely different answer...one that is always negative no less. So with that approach you get constantly negative temperatures...I'm very confused by what result I should be looking for.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you did here looks right to me.
 
EricVT said:
First of all, as the ENERGY increases the TEMPERATURE decreases?
(Heuristically speaking) Remember that as a black hole gains energy, it expands, which has a cooling effect. This apparently dominates other effects. This is why we expect large black holes to be very stable, whereas tiny black holes should evaporate away very quickly.
 
Thanks then.

Cheers.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top