Difficult air resistance problem

AI Thread Summary
In the shotput problem, the challenge lies in calculating the ratio of gravitational force to air resistance just before impact, given the shotput's launch parameters. The gravitational force is straightforward, but determining air resistance requires the instantaneous velocity, which complicates the equations of motion. Participants discuss deriving equations for horizontal and vertical motion while accounting for air resistance, noting that R acts against the shotput's velocity during ascent and descent. The conversation emphasizes the need to treat horizontal and vertical components separately and apply Newton's laws to derive accurate acceleration equations. Ultimately, the correct ratio of gravitational force to air resistance is noted to be 8100:1, although the derivation remains unclear for some contributors.
Xile
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
1. In a shotput event, a 2kg shotput is launched from a height of 1.5m with an initial velocity of 8m/s at an angle 60degrees to the horizontal. The formula R=0.0000378.v^2 gives the force due to air resistance (R) where v is the instantaneous velocity. Find the ratio of the gravitational force to the force due to air resistance, just before the shotput hits the ground.

If anyone could do this it would be much appreciated, cheers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please show some work. Write the equation of motions for horizontal and vertical flight with air resistance.

The force due to gravity is quite straightforward, but one needs the velocity to compute air resistance which will happen at an angle steeper than 60° to horizontal.
 
I spent a while on it, and seemed to end up with some weird looking equations. First i wrote an equation for both components of the velocity
Vv = Uv - (9.8 + Vv^2 . 0.0000378).t ie (0.0000378.t)Vv^2+Vv+(9.8t-Uv)=0
and same process (0.0000378t)Vh^2+Vh-Uh=0 keeping in mind we have the initial velocity and angle

i also got equations for displacement
Sv=Uvt - 0.5(9.8 + R).t^2
Sh=Uht - 0.5Rt^2
but i don't have the horizontal or vertical displacement, so i substituted into another equation and got
Vh^2 = Uh^2 - 2 . (9.8) . (Uht - 0.5Rt^2) which simplifies to
Vh=((16-8x9.8t)/(1-0.0000378x9.8)) but i don't have t, am i heading in the right direction coz i seem to be heading around in circles a bit.
 
Xile said:
so i substituted into another equation and got
Vh^2 = Uh^2 - 2 . (9.8) . (Uht - 0.5Rt^2) which simplifies to
Vh=((16-8x9.8t)/(1-0.0000378x9.8)) but i don't have t, am i heading in the right direction coz i seem to be heading around in circles a bit.
edit: that above equation is wrong and when i redid it its even more crazy with even mroe variables. i have the answer at the back of the book, its 8100:1 but i have no idea where it came from.
 
Last edited:
Careful that R is a resistance force, so the acceleration would be R/m.

Also, with respect to the vertical velocity component, R acts downward with gravity as the shot ascends, but then acts opposite gravity when the shot descends.

R acts continuously against the horizontal velocity component.
 
my mistake, but even so all i end up with is more variables and equations.
 
Just to be sure, R=0.0000378v2 is correct, right?

Then we know that R must always be less than 0.0000378 (8)2, because air resistance is always reducing the velocity components.

Treat vx and vy separately, and the vertical problem will have two parts.

Try using \frac{dv_x(t)}{dt}=-(k/m){v_x}^2(t) for the horizontal motion.

vertically \frac{dv_y(t)}{dt}=-(k/m){v_y}^2(t)-g on the way up. On the way down, change the sign in front of the air resistance term.
 
ah, that looks a lot better but i don't really understand how you got to there? it confuses me..
 
I simply wrote the equations for the changes in velocity (acclerations) in the vertical and horizontal. I applied Newton's laws, and then divide the forces by m to get accelerations.

The change in horizontal velocity is strictly due to air resistance, which is strictly related to the horizontal velocity.

I did it similarly for the vertical direction, but there gravity is always acting downward, and realize that the air resistance operates against the velocity - down going up and up going down. At the apogee, the problem becomes one of free fall, but with air resistance.
 
  • #10
but wouldn't the Vx(t)^2 be in the numerator, same with Vy(t)^2
 
  • #11
No, when rearranging, one obtains dv/v2 = -k/m dt in x, and

dv/(g+(k/m)v2) = - dt in y for the way up.
 
Back
Top