Difficult function of a function problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter contempquant
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the differentiation of a function of a function, specifically focusing on the double derivative of a function defined as E(𝑟) = E₀(𝑟)e^(ikz), where 𝑟 is a function of z. Participants are exploring the application of the chain rule in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to differentiate the function using the chain rule but expresses uncertainty about how to handle the partial derivatives due to the dependency of 𝑟 on z. Other participants suggest using the chain rule and question the definition of 𝑟, considering its implications on the differentiation process.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some offering insights into the differentiation process and questioning the notation used in the original problem statement. There is an acknowledgment of potential ambiguity in the definitions provided in the source material, leading to further exploration of the assumptions involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of clarity regarding the definition of 𝑟 in the context of the problem, as it is not explicitly defined in the referenced textbook. This has led to varying interpretations of how E₀ should be treated in relation to its variables.

contempquant
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm trying to solve a double derivative of a function of a function problem, but can't seem to be able to differentiate once. I have the formula given by the chain rule,

find [tex]\frac{d}{dz}{E}(\bar{r})[/tex] when [tex]{E}(\bar{r})={E_0}(\bar{r})e^{ikz}[/tex] and [tex]\bar{r}[/tex] is a function of z.

Homework Equations



I have used [tex]\frac{df}{dz}=\frac{dg}{df}\frac{df}{dz}h(x)+\frac{dh}{df}\frac{df}{dz}g(x)[/tex]

where [tex]g(x)={E_0}(\bar{r})[/tex] and [tex]h(x)=e^{ikz}[/tex]

and [tex]f=E(\bar{r})=E_{0}(\bar{r})[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I have then substituted in for these giving,

[tex]\frac{d{E_0}(\bar{r})exp^{ikz}}{dz}[/tex]=[tex]\frac{\partial{E_0}(\bar{r})}{\partial{E}(\bar{r})}\frac{\partial{E}(\bar{r})}{\partial{z}}*e^{ikz}+\frac{\partial{e^{ikz}}}{\partial{E}(\bar{r})}\frac{\partial{E}(\bar{r})}{\partial{z}}*E_{0}(\bar{r})[/tex]

The problem is i don't know how to differentiate any of the individual partial differentials because [tex]\bar{r}=r(z)[/tex], r is dependent on z. Any ideas? i really don't know how to start this one, and when this is done i have to differentiate it again. I'm sure if i can find out how to do this once i can do the second derivative but can't seem to do this one.

apparently the final solution is,

[tex](\frac{\partial^{2}E_{0}}{\partial{z}^{2}}+2ik\frac{\partial{E_0}}{\partial{z}}-k^{2}E_0)e^{ikz}[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone?
 
So in [tex]\mathbf{r}=x\mathbf{i}+y\mathbf{j}+z\mathbf{i}[/tex] and [tex]r=\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}[/tex] then you use the chain rule in the following way:

[tex] \frac{d}{dz}E_{0}(r)=\frac{dE_{0}}{dr}\frac{dr}{dz}[/tex]
 
sorry, that third line under relevant equations: [tex]f=E(\bar{r})=E_{0}(\bar{r})[/tex]
should read

[tex]f=E(\bar{r})=E_{0}(\bar{r})e^{ikz}[/tex]


I think that might change the answer you gave hunt_mat?
 
define [tex]\bar{r}[/tex] for me.
 
well that's the thing because [tex]\bar{r}[/tex] isn't defined in the book (Milonni, Lasers) but only the scalar version of r is defined, which is as you wrote it above,
[tex]r=\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+R^{2}}[/tex]

Where [tex]z=R[/tex], R is the distance along the z axis
 
So this r is a vector? I think that either you can take E_0 as a function of x, y, and z or that it only has radial dependence.
 
so the differential of [tex]\frac{\partial{E_0}(\bar{r})}{\partial{Z}[/tex] is just one?

how do i do the differential,
[tex]\frac{\partial{E_0}(\bar{r})}{\partial{E}(\bar{r}) }[/tex]? as it's taken w.r.t the starting function?
 
* [tex]\frac{\partial{E_0}(\bar{r})}{\partial{Z}}[/tex]
 
  • #10
I think that may be the case, having had a little look at the book on amazon, it seems like it's poor notation. I think the notation means that E_0 is a function of x,y and z and you just write down: the derivative as you have, that is how I would view the problem.
 
  • #11
ok i'll try that, thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K