Difficulty in learning physics

AI Thread Summary
Learning physics, particularly at an introductory level, can be challenging due to its conceptual nature, which differs significantly from mathematics. Many students find textbooks like Serway dense and confusing, prompting suggestions for alternatives such as Halliday and Resnick. Building a strong intuition for physics is crucial, as it helps in visualizing problems and understanding the underlying principles. Effective study habits, such as focusing on examples rather than extensive note-taking, can enhance comprehension. Ultimately, consistent practice and a shift in mindset towards understanding concepts rather than rote memorization are essential for success in physics.
thushanthan
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi everyone,

I am taking 'Mechanics' ( Introductory level - Calculus based ) this summer. I already passed my Calculus I ( Differentiation ). The textbook we are using is " Physics for scientists and engineers" by Serway. I am facing some difficulties with learning. I found that it is not like math. What is best way to learn physics. Text book is too confusing for me. Is there are any good calculus based physics books other than Serway?? Thank you!

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think Serway is pretty good, that's what I used as a freshman. Another popular text is by Halliday and Resnick, you could try that out.

Once you build your physics intuition you'll find physics to be quite easy. It's pretty easy to build an answer when you already have an idea of how the answer will look like. Maybe we could help you out more if you say what you are specifically struggling with.
 
I have trouble with interpreting the word problems to the equivalent mathematical statements.:confused:
 
I am currently using the Serway book for my intro mechanics class, and I will agree that it is a somewhat dense book, the reading is a bit rough. What are your note taking habbits both in and out of the classroom? I find that students, including myself, who scribble down copius amounts of notes often get left behind because it is very very difficult to follow along with the next concept while writing down the last concept. I now only write down examples, no notes what so ever from the lecture, but I am very invovled in the lecture basically repeating everything my proffesor is saying and if it clicks I move on, if not I question it. When I approach these problems, I attempt to visualize what is happening ( I am a visual learner) and what ought to happen, I set up a range of acceptable answers basically. There is one caveat to this approach and that is that physics is sometimes opposite to human intuition my high school physics teacher once told me "Physics is the most illogical, logical science". Also you may already know this about physics as well with calc, and that is physics is a practice sport, it cannot just be read and via diffusion you are Richard Feynman. Being profficient in physics does not just come from a great memory or good comprehension, it comes from the confidence of being familliar with all problems your proffesor may deliver to you. The long short of it is practice, practice, practice as well as a different mind set. Trying to relate physics concepts to math concepts is difficult and so far in my studies the only simillarities I have found were with related rates from calc, other than that math is just understanding differentiation/integration rules and some abstract thought (at the calc I level anyway). Physics on the other hand is all abstract thought and remembering a few of the general rules such as conservation and so on. Hope this helps, and if what I have said you are already doing, then take it as positive reinforcement of your method.

Joe
 
thushanthan said:
I have trouble with interpreting the word problems to the equivalent mathematical statements.:confused:

All my profs have said, the difficulties in physics may not always be the math, but interpreting exactly what the question is asking.

I always find drawing a picture writing your known values and physical principles involved helps. It is important to also do all the examples in the textbook, and figuring out exactly why each thing is the way it is.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
71
Views
683
Back
Top