Diffraction Grating and Dispersion

AI Thread Summary
A diffraction grating with a slit separation of 2094.0 nm is analyzed for the dispersion of its 2nd order lines at a 30-degree angle. The initial confusion arose from incorrect calculations of wavelength and the need for the correct dispersion equation. The correct formula for dispersion is D = m/(d cosΘ), leading to a calculated dispersion of 1.10 degrees per micrometer. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using the right equations and understanding the relationship between angle and wavelength. Ultimately, the key takeaway is mastering the mathematical relationships in diffraction to solve such problems effectively.
lauraliz94
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement
A diffraction grating has a slit separation of 2094.0 nm. What is the dispersion of the 2nd order lines at an angle of 30 degrees (in degrees per micrometer)?

Homework Equations


dsinΘ=mλ
y=(mDλ)/d

3. Attempt at a solution
I began by finding λ using the first equation, so...
2λ=.002094(sin(.30))
λ=.00000548205
Note: I changed d from nm to mm before I began any calculations

We haven't gone over this in class yet, so I'm confused on where to go from here. I believe it has something to do with the second equation listed above, but I don't know what variable represents the dispersion or if these are really even the equations I need. I would like some guidance as for what steps to take next or what equations I should be using- I think just a push in the right direction could help immensely.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello LL, welcome to PF :)

Check your calculations ! sin(.30) is not the sine of 30 degrees ! I don't see how you can end up with 5.5 nm wavelength (assuming you report it in mm -- why do you do that if they want an answer in degrees per micrometer ?).

And the angular dispersion is nothing else than ##d\theta\over d\lambda##.
So you're better off with the first eqn than with the second (that is -- if I am not mistaken -- a distance y off-axis on a screen at distance D).

Now, what is ##d\theta\over d\lambda## at ##\ \ \theta = \pi/6\ \ ## if ## \ d\sin\theta = 2\lambda\ ## ?

It's more math than physics...
 
Hi BvU!

Alright, I was able to work on the problem in class- I was missing a vital equation that made the whole process really easy.

The equation should be D=m/(d)cosΘ

So if...
D=dispersion
m=2
d=2.094 micrometers
Θ=30 degrees

Then the equation reads...
D=(2)/(2.094cos(30))
D=1.10 deg/micrometer

I'm sorry about the confusion, I really appreciated your help! You were right, it was just figuring out what math is the right math!
 
And here's me thinking you were supposed to derive this vital equation. You were nearly there!

The "math" (physicists have their own ideas about how to deal with differentials :) ) is real easy: $$
\ d\sin\theta = 2\lambda\quad\Rightarrow\ d \cos\theta \; d\theta = 2\; d\lambda\quad \Rightarrow\ {d\theta\over d\lambda} = {2\over d\cos\theta}$$
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top