Diffraction & Interference: Investigating Wavelengths with Fresnel Biprism

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on diffraction and interference using Fresnel Biprism, the focus is on how refraction affects the wavelength of light. It is clarified that while a prism refracts light, the original wavelength remains unchanged after passing through the prism, although different wavelengths are refracted differently. The setup creates two virtual light sources that interfere, allowing for the application of diffraction formulas to determine the spacing between maxima and ultimately calculate the wavelength. A challenge noted is the need to calculate the spacing of the virtual sources, which cannot be measured directly. Overall, the principles of diffraction and interference remain applicable despite the refraction effects of the prism.
v_pino
Messages
156
Reaction score
0
I'm doing a lab report on diffraction and interference. I've done several diffraction experiments (single slit, double slit, diffraction grating, Fresnel Biprism) to find the wavelength of the laser used. with Fresnel Biprism, wouldn't the refraction within the prism cause a change in wavelength? Or would it not matter? - would it go back to its original wavelength after the wave passes through and out of the prism?

thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well a prism refracts the light going through it. Different wavelengths would be refracted by different amounts (thats why white light turns into a rainbow). If you send a red laser in, it would still be red, just refracted, creating a virtual light source. With the biprism setup, you would get two virtual light sources which would interfere. Now from here I believe you would use the same diffraction formulas to find the spacing between the maxima, and from there you would solve for wavelength. I believe there is a tricky part where you need to calculate the spacing of the two virtual sources, because you can't measure them directly. I don't remember how :S

This is very brief, but please let us know if you need more detail.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top