Diffraction pattern and Fourier Transform

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between diffraction patterns produced by laser light passing through a grating and the Fourier transform (FT) of that grating pattern. It posits that the spatial frequencies of the grating and the laser wavelength influence the diffraction pattern, suggesting a mathematical connection to the FT. The conversation highlights that the Fraunhofer diffraction pattern represents the intensity wave of the FT function, rather than the FT itself. It clarifies that the far-field diffraction pattern of an aperture is the complex Fourier transform of the aperture, with implications for various imaging techniques. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the field transformation in relation to intensity detection and imaging fidelity.
transform
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hello
I wonder if the diffraction pattern after Laserlight going thru a grating pattern (say 10 slots) has anything to do with the Fourier transform of the grating pattern.
I am not a physicist, but have some knowledge of Fourier math.
I think the spatial frequencies of the grating pattern plus the wavelength of the laser determin the diffraction pattern, and mathematically it has something to do with the FT of the grating pattern, but I am not sure!?
can anybody elaborate on this a little bit?
here is an example of the kind of diffraction pattern i mean
http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/DiffractionGratingIntensities/
 
Science news on Phys.org
the book seems to cover all the aspects of FT and holography which I am interested in and want to know!
I just continued to look in the web for more information on diffraction pattern and FT. In one paper I found the notion that the actual (Fraunhofer) diffraction pattern gives back the intensity wave of the FT function, not directly the FT.
So can one say that the diffraction pattern gives a kind of picture what the FT of the grating pattern looks like?
 
The far-field diffraction pattern of an aperture is the (complex) Fourier transform of the aperture. Placing a lens after the aperture slightly alters this, but *if* the aperture is located at the entrance pupil of the lens, *then* the field at the back focal plane is the complex Fourier transform of the aperture. Moving planes around adds phase factors, essentially. Laue patterns, x-ray crystallography, Bragg scattering etc. all use this phenomonon.

Note it's the *field* that is transformed, not the intensity, and it is indeed a complex transform. Detectors (in the visible region) are sensitive to the intensity only; that has an effect but not a conceptual change. For coherent detection (phase-sensitive detectors), the transfer function is the field at the entrance pupil; for incoherent detection (intensity detection), the transfer function is the autocorrelation of the entrance pupil. For aberration-free imaging, the cutoff frequency in incoherent detection is twice that of coherent detection.
 
Thread 'Simple math model for a Particle Image Velocimetry system'
Hello togehter, I am new to this forum and hope this post followed all the guidelines here (I tried to summarized my issue as clean as possible, two pictures are attached). I would appreciate every help: I am doing research on a Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) system. For this I want to set a simple math model for the system. I hope you can help me out. Regarding this I have 2 main Questions. 1. I am trying to find a math model which is describing what is happening in a simple Particle...
Thread 'How to model converging illumination through object plane (in ZEMAX)'
Hello community, I'm designing a projection lens system for a 35mm film projector in Zemax OpticStudio and struggling with the correct sequential mode setup for the illumination geometry. The light source is a Xenon short-arc lamp reflected by an ellipsoid mirror, which creates a converging cone with a 40.6 degree full angle that passes through the film gate. The film gate is my object plane, but the light doesn't diverge from it like a typical Lambertian source. Instead, the converging...
Back
Top