Diffraction Patterns: Does Distance Affect Diffraction?

AI Thread Summary
Single slit diffraction can occur with varying distances between imagined subdivisions of the slit, such as a/2, a/3, or a/4, leading to constructive interference at different angles. The intensity pattern produced from these subdivisions results in both constructive and destructive interference, with the overall intensity described by the sinc function. The integral over the slit opening is crucial for determining the intensity at any point on the screen. This means that while there are points of destructive interference, constructive interference can also be achieved with different configurations. Understanding these principles is essential for analyzing diffraction patterns effectively.
haha1234
Messages
109
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Is it necessary that a single slit diffraction occur with the two source having the distance of \frac{a}{2}?Are there any diffractions occur when the point source having the distance of \frac{a}{3},\frac{a}{4} and so on?
And I would like to know whether are there only destructive interference occur?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • 1393493114853[1].jpg
    1393493114853[1].jpg
    19.3 KB · Views: 427
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Ha,
There are no two sources in the drawing; there is only the one slit opening that is imagined to be subdivided into two "sources" that are deemed a/2 apart. As you correctly suspect, it is equally well possible to subdivide into 3, 4, 5, etc. sources (with successively smaller extension / width) that interfere constructively at greater and greater angles. In the resulting intensity pattern the angles in between have destructive interference.

The intensity at a given point on the screen is in fact an integral over the slit opening. See e.g. Fraunhofer diffraction or Single slit diffraction.

The resulting intensity pattern is ##{\sin^2 x \over x^2}\ ##; ##\ \ \ {\sin x \over x}## has been found to be important enough to get its own name: ##{\rm sinc}\ x##
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top