Diffraction Problem, Calculate Slit Width

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the slit width for a single slit diffraction pattern created by light of wavelength 680 nm, observed on a screen 50 cm away. The distance between the first and third minima is given as 3 mm. The initial calculation mistakenly included an extra factor, leading to an incorrect value for the slit width. The correct approach requires using the distance between the first and third minima, which involves considering both minima in the calculations. Ultimately, the correct formula must account for the positions of both the first and third minima to accurately determine the slit width.
TheRedDevil18
Messages
406
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Light of wavelength 680nm falls onto a single slit. The diffraction pattern is observed on a screen 50cm away. If the distance between the first and the third minima is 3mm, calculate the slit width?


Homework Equations



sin thetha = m*lambda/a
y = m*lambda*R/a

The Attempt at a Solution



So the distance between the first position and last position of the dark band is 3mm?

I think this is wrong:

3*10^-3 = (3)(680*10^-9)(0.5)/a
a = 3.4*10^-4 m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TheRedDevil18 said:

Homework Equations



sin thetha = m*lambda/a
y = m*lambda*R/a

The Attempt at a Solution



So the distance between the first position and last position of the dark band is 3mm?

I think this is wrong:

3*10^-3 = (3)(680*10^-9)(0.5)/a
a = 3.4*10^-4 m

There are a couple of issues with your attempt.

1. It looks like you have inserted an extra factor of 0.5 for no apparent reason.

2. Without the 0.5, the formula gives the spacing between the 3rd minimum and the central maximum.
However, the 3 mm given in the problem statement refers to the spacing between the 3rd minimum and the 1st minimum. So you need to bring the 1st minimum (n=1) into the picture.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top