Dilution process in spectrophometer

  • Thread starter Thread starter Serenie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dilution Process
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the use of a spectrophotometer in conjunction with Beer-Lambert's law during neutralization titrations involving weak acids or bases. Concerns are raised about potential errors in absorbance measurements due to water's autoionization affecting concentration during the dilution process. The relationship between absorbance and concentration is emphasized, noting that ideally, this relationship is linear and intersects the origin on a concentration-absorbance plot. Clarification is sought on whether the focus is on endpoint detection of titration or concentration measurement. It is pointed out that while measuring concentration is important, the primary goal in titration is to detect the endpoint, which can be achieved through various methods, including pH meters or indicators, rather than solely relying on spectrophotometric measurements. The conversation highlights the distinction between measuring concentration and determining titration endpoints, suggesting that the impact of autoionization on dilution may be negligible.
Serenie
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
When using spectrophotometer, to use Rambert-beer's law, we often go through dilution process. Then when measuring neutralization reaction and using week acid or base, then because of water's autoionizaition, i think the results have error.
Is it right?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
The law relies on the idea that absorbance is a linear relationship to concentration. Ideally, linear, and (I believe) the line crosses the concentration-absorbance plot at the origin.
 
Serenie said:
when measuring neutralization reaction

Please elaborate, it is not clear to what you refer here. End point detection of titration, or something else?
 
Serenie said:
When using spectrophotometer, to use Rambert-beer's law, we often go through dilution process. Then when measuring neutralization reaction and using week acid or base, then because of water's autoionizaition, i think the results have error.
Is it right?
After reread and thinking about this again, the description is of two usually very separate things: Spectrophotometer to help measure concentration of some dissolved item which absorbs a specified wavelength of visible light; and neutralization titration between acid and base for which endpoint detection would be either by pH-meter, or acid-base indicator compound. These two ideas are usually not related. Maybe you tell what item is being measured?
 
What i mean is that when doing neutralization titration, we need to measure the concentration. And i want to measure it by spectrophotometer. But when using spectrophotometer, i often need to go through dilution process. Then, while doing the dilution process in the acid solutiton, the concentration may change because of water's autoionizaition.
So what I'm wondering is whether by doing dilution process, the change in concentration (because of autoionization) is trivial enough to ignore.

i'm sorry about my bad english.
 
Serenie said:
What i mean is that when doing neutralization titration, we need to measure the concentration.

No, we don't need to detect the concentration, we need to detect the endpoint of the titration. These are two different things.

In general the discussion behind is not very different from the discussion of the end point detection when using one- and two- color indicators. Compare http://www.titrations.info/acid-base-titration-end-point-detection
 
  • Like
Likes symbolipoint
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
Back
Top