Dimension of intersection of subspaces proof

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
Dansuer
Messages
81
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


[itex]V[/itex] is a vector space with dimension n, [itex]U[/itex] and [itex]W[/itex] are two subspaces with dimension k and l.
prove that if k+l > n then [itex]U \cap W[/itex] has dimension > 0

Homework Equations


Grassmann's formula

[itex]dim(U+W) = dim(U) + dim(W) - dim(U \cap W)[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Suppose k+l >n.
Suppose that [itex]dim(U \cap W) \leq 0[/itex]

since the dimension can't be negative [itex]dim(U \cap W) = 0[/itex]

then Grassman formula reduces to

[itex]dim(U+W) = dim(U) + dim(W)[/itex]
[itex]dim(U+W) = k +l > n[/itex]

this is a contraddiction because [itex]U+W[/itex] has dimension grater than the dimension of his enclosing space.

is this a valid proof?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
that [itex]dim(U \cap W) > 0[/itex]
since you are asking me that question do i have to assume that my proof is wrong?

EDIT: ops

I have to prove that if k+l > n then [itex]dim(U \cap W) > 0[/itex]
 
Last edited: