Dimensional Analysis Help (Algebra Based)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on two algebra-based problems involving dimensional analysis. For the first problem, participants clarify that the equation T = 2π√(L/g) is dimensionally consistent, emphasizing that the 2π is a constant with no units and does not affect the dimensional analysis. They confirm that acceleration (g) is expressed as m/s², and through simplification, the units for time (T) can be shown to be seconds. In the second problem, the conversation shifts to understanding the relationship between force, momentum, and time, suggesting that the units can be equated to derive necessary constants. Overall, the thread highlights the importance of unit consistency in solving physics problems.
Dig
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Problem #1
http://img230.imageshack.us/img230/705/hwpicvf5.jpg

Problem #2
http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/3196/hwpic2fb4.jpg

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Problem #1)
I do not know where to proceed from here

I have.
T = 2pi * square root of L/g
where T = time, g = acceleration
L = length
I know that acceleration = Length/Time^2
so I get
T = 2pi * square root of L/(L/T^2)
I also do not understand how 2pi eventually plays a part in this.


Problem #2)
I honestly do not know where to start with this problem. If I understood the first part, the second part wouldn't be a problem. What does kg.m^2/s^2 mean?

I know that these are very basic questions, but my book assumes a lot and takes leaps and I unfortunately need things spelled out for me from time to time. Any help given is more than appreciated. :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first one, to show that it is consistent, you need to show that the units on the right=units on the left.

The unit of the period is seconds,s. The 2pi has no role when dealing with the units since, it has none!
length=m
g=ms-2

now just simplify this

\sqrt{\frac{m}{ms^{-2}}
 
rock.freak667 said:
For the first one, to show that it is consistent, you need to show that the units on the right=units on the left.

The unit of the period is seconds,s. The 2pi has no role when dealing with the units since, it has none!
length=m
g=ms-2

now just simplify this

\sqrt{\frac{m}{ms^{-2}}

Thank you for your quick reply :).

I was under the impression that g(acceleration) was equal to m(length) divided by s(time) squared. Am I wrong about this or is there some sort of exception I am not understanding here?

Thanks.
 
Dig said:
I was under the impression that g(acceleration) was equal to m(length) divided by s(time) squared. Am I wrong about this or is there some sort of exception I am not understanding here?



Acceleration is m/s^2, another way to write that is ms^-2 . You can treat them like indices.
 
rock.freak667 said:
Acceleration is m/s^2, another way to write that is ms^-2 . You can treat them like indices.

Ok, I'm going to take a shot at what you left me with.

If I multiply it by ^1/2, the m's cancel out, and I am left with (s^2)^1/2 which leaves me with s. So, that would make the original equation correct as s=s.

Am I correct here?

I understand what you meant by acceleration being ms^-2 now. Thanks :)

With your method of ms^-2, the m's cancel out and you are left with the square root of s^-2. This would be the square root of 1/s^2. This would be s * square root of 1; which is s. Am I correct here? It's been a while since college algebra lol.
 
Dig said:
Ok, I'm going to take a shot at what you left me with.

If I multiply it by ^1/2, the m's cancel out, and I am left with (s^2)^1/2 which leaves me with s. So, that would make the original equation correct as s=s.

Am I correct here?

Very much so.
 
rock.freak667 said:
Very much so.

I edited my message and did it your way at the bottom. Can you tell me if I applied that correctly?

Also, why doesn't the pi count? I hate to be difficult, but it's just so confusing to see that 2pi out in front and it not mean anything lol.
 
Dig said:
With your method of ms^-2, the m's cancel out and you are left with the square root of s^-2. This would be the square root of 1/s^2. This would be s * square root of 1; which is s. Am I correct here? It's been a while since college algebra lol.

you'd get the sq.root of 1/s-2 which is the same as s2

Well 2 and pi are just constants with no units.
 
rock.freak667 said:
you'd get the sq.root of 1/s-2 which is the same as s2

Well 2 and pi are just constants with no units.

I thought that s^-2 became 1/s^2.
 
  • #10
Dig said:
I thought that s^-2 became 1/s^2.

\frac{m}{ms^{-2}}=\frac{1}{s^{-2}}


Like that. Don't forget that that the m's canceled out.
 
  • #11
rock.freak667 said:
\frac{m}{ms^{-2}}=\frac{1}{s^{-2}}


Like that. Don't forget that that the m's canceled out.

Noted!

I appreciate your help a lot man.


Any chance you could take a look at the second problem?
I mostly need to understand the first part and the measurement and stuff.

Any help is appreciated :).
 
  • #12
Well the force F depends on momentum and time right?

So you could simplify the equation as this:

F=k patb

k is just a constant with no units. a and b are numbers that you need to find.

just write the units of momentum and time in the formula. Assuming that you have the base units of Force, just equate the terms.

e.g. kgm=kgxm

then x=1. Like that.
 
Back
Top