Dirac delta integrated from 0 to infinity

Heimisson
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if I integrate the dirac delta function from 0 to infinity where the function it's integrated with is the constant 1, will I get 0.5 or 1? And why?

This is not homework so I decided to post this here although I asked this question in class and the teacher (assistant) wasn't too sure. I could ask my professor but he's a scary man and mocks your questions.

So I was hoping someone here could answer this.

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Heimisson said:
I was wondering if I integrate the dirac delta function from 0 to infinity where the function it's integrated with is the constant 1, will I get 0.5 or 1? And why?

This is not homework so I decided to post this here although I asked this question in class and the teacher (assistant) wasn't too sure. I could ask my professor but he's a scary man and mocks your questions.

So I was hoping someone here could answer this.

thanks

Depends on which direction you approach 0 from. If your integral is...

lim_{a\rightarrow{0^-}} \int_a^\infty \delta(x) dx

Then the answer is 1. If your integral is...


lim_{a\rightarrow{0^+}} \int_a^\infty \delta(x) dx

Then the answer is 0.
 
You get 1/2, Dirac delta is a symmetric function.
 
peteratcam said:
You get 1/2, Dirac delta is a symmetric function.

It's not even really a function...
 
Char. Limit said:
Depends on which direction you approach 0 from. If your integral is...

lim_{a\rightarrow{0^-}} \int_a^\infty \delta(x) dx

Then the answer is 1. If your integral is...


lim_{a\rightarrow{0^+}} \int_a^\infty \delta(x) dx

Then the answer is 0.

Thanks a lot this makes sense.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Back
Top