Dirac gammology - dimension of the algebra

Loro
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Dirac matrices satisfy the relations:

\gamma^\mu\gamma^\nu+\gamma^\nu\gamma^\mu=2g^{\mu\nu}

I would like to understand why the dimension of this algebra in 3+1 dimensions is 4.

If we're looking for all possible sets {\gamma^0,\gamma^1,\gamma^2,\gamma^3} of 4x4 matrices that satisfy this, how do I show that when I find just one set, it already forms a complete basis?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know that there are 4 matrices to begin with (the nr of matrices is equal to the dimension of space-time, i.e 4).. You need to show they are 4*4 and not 3*3, 5*5, 6*6, etc. You can show that starting with these 4, there are 12 more linear independent matrices. Then the dimension of representation follows from the theorem of Schur and Frobenius.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top