Dirac Hydrogen Atom: Parity and Odd-Operator

ChrisVer
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
Hey I was reading through a text and came across:
"[ Having extracted the Dirac version of Schrodinger's equation of the H atom...] Since the states | j j_z l > have definite parity, the odd-operator \vec{S} \cdot \hat{r} will have vanishing diagonal elements. Also since \big(\vec{S} \cdot \hat{r} \big)^2 =1 then its offdiagonal elements will be \frac{1}{2} e^{\pm i \phi} (we can choose the phase \phi=0)[...]"

I can understand the second statement from the Pauli matrices... However I think that I don't understand the 1st statement as it is... why would the diagonal elements of an odd-operator be zero if parity is definite?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think what they mean as "fixed" is actually "definite".
 
  • Like
Likes ChrisVer
Yup understand that... (a flaw in my translation :biggrin:)...I don't understand why the diagonal elements are zero.
 
If ##A## is an odd operator and ##\pi## is a parity operator, then we have ##\pi^\dagger A \pi = -A##. If furthermore a state ##|\psi\rangle## which has a definite parity sandwhiches the expression ##\pi^\dagger A \pi = -A## from left and right in each side of the equation, you will get ##\langle \psi| A |\psi \rangle = -\langle \psi|A|\psi \rangle## because ##\langle \psi|\pi^\dagger A \pi|\psi \rangle = \langle \psi| A |\psi \rangle##. You see then we must require ##\langle \psi| A |\psi \rangle = 0## so that the previous relation can hold.
 
  • Like
Likes Nugatory, vanhees71, JorisL and 1 other person
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top