Direct calculation of the propagator

SamuraiJack
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I have a fundamental problem with the concept of the propagator regarding to time dependent potential. If the propagator is based on the expansion of the time evolution operator, how can it act on initial wave function in the presence of time dependent potential? You cannot use the evolution operator with these kind of potentials. I can accept the solution of Feynman path integrals, because in this frame, the time is split to many short intervals in which the time evolution operator is valid. However, can you still calculate the propagator by direct calculation?

Thanks, The Samurai.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, you can form an evolution operator even in the case of time dependent potential. The only difference is that if there's explicit time-dependence in the Hamiltonian, the evolution operator is a function of both initial and final times, ##U(t_{1},t_{2})##, instead of only the time difference, ##U(t_{2}-t_{1})##.
 
Hi Hilbert, thank you for your response. I'm still not sure if the propagator is still valid though. When the propagator is calculated directly, we employ ##\langle x|e^{-iH(t_{1}-t_{2})/\hbar}|x'\rangle##. Can we calculate it by ##\langle x|U(t_{1},t_{2})|x'\rangle##?
 
No we don't :-).

Rather we solve
\mathrm{i} \hbar \partial_t \hat{U}(t,t')=\hat{H}(t) \hat{U}(t,t'), \quad \hat{U}(t,t)=1
(in the Schrödinger picture of time evolution).

The formal solution is
\hat{U}(t,t') = \mathcal{T}_c \exp \left [-\frac{\mathrm{i}}{\hbar}\int_{t'}^{t} \mathrm{d} t'' \hat{H}(t'') \right ],
where \mathcal{T}_c is the causal time-ordering symbol. For details, see my QFT manuscript (Sect. 1.3)

http://fias.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/publ/lect.pdf

Note that there the general interaction picture of time-evolution is discussed!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
134
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top