Direct sum of the eigenspaces equals V?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bipolarity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direct sum Sum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the eigenspaces of a linear operator and the vector space V, particularly in the context of diagonalizability. Participants explore the conditions under which the direct sum of eigenspaces equals V, considering cases of distinct eigenvalues and multiplicities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the direct sum of the eigenspaces equals V, particularly when considering diagonalizability.
  • Another participant asserts that if all eigenvalues are distinct and V is k-dimensional, then the statement is correct.
  • A different participant raises a concern about the scenario where the dimension of V exceeds the number of distinct eigenvalues, suggesting complications arise if eigenvalues have multiplicity.
  • It is noted that for a diagonalizable n by n matrix, there exist n independent eigenvectors, and for an eigenvalue with multiplicity, independent vectors can be found that span the corresponding eigenspace.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the conditions under which the direct sum of eigenspaces equals V, particularly regarding distinct eigenvalues and multiplicities. The discussion remains unresolved as multiple competing views are presented.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding assumptions about the distinctness of eigenvalues and the implications of eigenvalue multiplicity on the dimensionality of eigenspaces.

Bipolarity
Messages
773
Reaction score
2
I am following Friedberg's text and having some trouble understanding some of the theorems regarding diagonalizability. The proofs seem to skip some steps, so I guess I need to work through them a bit more slowly.

Given a linear operator ## T:V → V ##, with eigenspaces ## \{ E_{ \lambda_{1}},E_{ \lambda_{2}},...E_{ \lambda_{k}} \} ##, is it true that ## E_{ \lambda_{1}} \bigoplus E_{ \lambda_{2}} \bigoplus E_{ \lambda_{2}} ... \bigoplus E_{ \lambda_{k}} = V ## ?

What if T is diagonalizable? This is just a thought which may perhaps help me to understand diagonalizability a bit better. I simply need to know whether this is right or not. Please no explanations, as I will prove it myself. Thanks!

BiP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming all eigenvalues are distinct (V is k dimensional), it is correct.

Things get slightly more complicated if an eigenvalue has multiplicity. The eigenvectors for such an eigenvalue define a multidimensional space (dimension = multiplicity of eigenvalue).
 
Suppose the eigenvalues are distinct, but dim(V) > k so that the eigenvalues all have multiplicity. Then what?

BiP
 
If the n by n matrix, V, is diagonalizable then we have n independent eigenvectors. If a given eigenvalue has multiplicity i then we can find i independent vectors that span its "eigenspace". The whole point of "diagonal" is that there exist a basis such that all vectors in the basis are eigenvectors.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K