Direction and magnitude of the current

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the direction and magnitude of current in a circuit with a 1.00 kΩ resistor and a 250 V source. Participants suggest applying Kirchhoff's loop rule to analyze the circuit, considering the combination of 4R and 3R resistors in parallel to simplify calculations. There is confusion regarding the values of x and y in the equations used to find the currents I1 and I2, as well as the total resistance in the modified circuit. Clarification is sought on how to accurately represent the current through the combined resistors. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying circuit analysis principles to solve the problem.
zooropa
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Taking R = 1.00 kΩ and ε = 250 V in the figure, determine the direction and magnitude of the current in the horizontal wire between a and e.
http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/7250/img001nkm.th.jpg


Homework Equations


Kirchhoff´s law


The Attempt at a Solution


I must try to apply Kirchhoff´s loop rule to both rules?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, all three loops. Or perhaps you could combine the 4R and 3R in parallel to get a simpler circuit with only two loops. Once you know I1 and I2, it should be easy to find I in the original circuit.
 
I think it will be done with 4R and 3R in parallel. But how can i have the value of the new R?
 
Last edited:
If i have the new value of R i could find I1 and I2, like this:
(xR)I1+(yR)I2=250
and
(xR)I1+(yR)I2=500

I think it will be the solution, but the problem is that i can't find the new value of x and y if i combine the 4R and 3R in parallel to get a simpler circuit with only two loops.
Any help? Thanks
 
The 4R and 3R (4000 and 3000 ohms) are in parallel. You must use the formula for the resistance of two resistors in parallel.

I don't understand what your x and y represent.
It seems to me the current through the combined resistors would be I1 + I2, so the equations will each have one more term than you have shown.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top