Direction observed by fish when man flying air to water?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the direction of velocity observed by fish when a man descends from the air into water. It is established that the man's movement is downward as he approaches the pond. The fish in the pond would perceive this downward velocity. Participants encourage further clarification and attempts to solve the problem for better assistance. Overall, the focus is on understanding the dynamics of motion from air to water as seen by aquatic life.
Lakshman Chaudhari
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
what is the direction of velocity observed by fish when man flying from air to water?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to pf.
Not enough information.
 
Lakshman Chaudhari said:
what is the direction of velocity observed by fish when man flying from air to water?
Downward.
 
Lakshman Chaudhari said:
A man vertically downward from air to pond.The fish in the pond to see which direction the man's velocity.
 
You have quoted yourself but the quoted passage does not appear anywhere in the thread. Where is the quote from?
However, that gives enough information, well done. Now please show your best attempt at the problem so we know how best to help you.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top