Direction of force without right-hand rule?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vinster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction Force
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding an alternative method to determine the direction of force on a charged particle in a magnetic field without using the right-hand rule. Participants suggest calculating the force using the formula qv × B, which provides a mathematical approach to find the components of the force. The original poster expresses a desire for a conceptual understanding rather than a reliance on hand gestures. The conversation highlights the importance of both mathematical calculations and intuitive grasp of physics concepts. Overall, the thread emphasizes the need for accessible methods to understand magnetic forces on charged particles.
Vinster
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi guys
I'm not sure if this is the right area - this is my first post - but it seems like it fits so

My question is, is there a way to get the direction of force on a charged particle from a magnetic field without using the right hand rule? What I'm looking for would be a way to just think about it, rather than look at my hands, or imagine my hands.

Thanks for any answers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could calculate ##q\vec v\times \vec B## [and, if needed, get the components]
 
robphy said:
You could calculate ##q\vec v\times \vec B## [and, if needed, get the components]
derp...for someone currently finishing up a linear algebra course.. I should have gotten that xP but thanks a ton!
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top