Directional Derivative of Potential energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the notation used in classical physics, specifically in the context of potential energy and force equations. The indices "i" and "j" in "Vij" represent different particles, with "V23" indicating the potential energy between particle 2 and particle 3. The notation ∇i signifies that the derivative is taken with respect to the position of particle i, focusing on its coordinates rather than those of particle j. This distinction is crucial for understanding how forces are derived from potential energy changes specific to each particle's position. The clarification highlights that the derivatives pertain to the components of the position vector for particle i, emphasizing the importance of the subscript in the del operator.
vgptgupta
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm facing some problem in understanding few basic concepts of classical physics.

http://www.fotoshack.us/fotos/67357p0020-sel.jpg I cannot understand what does "ij" indicate in "Vij" and how does F=-∇iVij. Why ∇i, why not only ∇.

Please help anybody. I'm practically getting frustrated googling for answers.

N.B. Equation 1.29
http://www.fotoshack.us/fotos/74847p0019-sel.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
i and j in Vij are indices for particle numbers. As an example, V23 is the potential between particle 2 and particle 3.
##\nabla_i## refers to the change of the position of particle i.
 
Thanks for the "ij" explanation but what about my other question i.e., why F=-∇iVij and why ∇i, why not only ∇.
 
There is no obvious meaning of ∇. Derivative for what?
What is meant here is the change in potential for particle i.
 
So what does the line "the subscript i on the del operator indicates that the derivatives are with respect to the components of ri" mean.
 
It means that the derivatives are with respect to xi, yi and zi, not xj, yj and zj.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top