Directional derivatives for altitude

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the direction to maintain a constant altitude while standing on a hill represented by the equation z=500-0.006x²-0.008y², specifically at the point (-100,-100,360). The focus is on the concept of directional derivatives and gradient vectors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the requirement for the directional derivative to be zero to maintain constant altitude, leading to the exploration of the gradient vector and its role in determining direction.
  • Some participants express confusion about how to derive the direction vector u and its relationship to the gradient.
  • There is a suggestion to find a relation between components of u based on the dot product with the gradient vector.
  • Questions arise regarding the nature of the vector u, including whether it can be the zero vector and the need for it to be a unit vector.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various interpretations of the problem. Some have provided guidance on how to approach the calculation of the direction vector, while others are clarifying the requirements for u, including its magnitude and potential forms.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential ambiguity regarding whether the direction should be expressed as a unit vector or in angular terms, indicating a need for further clarification on the problem's requirements.

reddawg
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose you are standing at the point (-100,-100,360) on a hill that has the shape of the graph of z=500-0.006x2-0.008y2.

In what direction should you head to maintain a constant altitude?

Homework Equations


Duf = ∇f[itex]\bullet[/itex]u
formula for directional derivative


The Attempt at a Solution


Here's my idea. If the directional derivative at the point specified is zero, then that's equivalent to maintaining constant altitude. Therefore, I must find the corresponding gradient vector ∇f when the directional derivative is zero right? I have no idea how to carry this out however.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
reddawg said:

Homework Statement


Suppose you are standing at the point (-100,-100,360) on a hill that has the shape of the graph of z=500-0.006x2-0.008y2.

In what direction should you head to maintain a constant altitude?

Homework Equations


Duf = ∇f[itex]\bullet[/itex]u
formula for directional derivative


The Attempt at a Solution


Here's my idea. If the directional derivative at the point specified is zero, then that's equivalent to maintaining constant altitude. Therefore, I must find the corresponding gradient vector ∇f when the directional derivative is zero right? I have no idea how to carry this out however.

Yes, find the gradient vector. But you can't choose what it is, it's fixed by the problem statement. What you need to find is a vector u such that the directional derivative is zero.
 
Ok, I'm confused on how to go about this.

0 = ∇f[itex]\bullet[/itex]u

You say ∇f is fixed:

∇f = <zx,zy>

= < -0.012x, -0.016y >

= < 1.2, 1.6 > Subs. coordinates given

Then solve for u?
 
reddawg said:
Ok, I'm confused on how to go about this.

0 = ∇f[itex]\bullet[/itex]u

You say ∇f is fixed:

∇f = <zx,zy>

= < -0.012x, -0.016y >

= < 1.2, 1.6 > Subs. coordinates given

Then solve for u?

Yes, write u=<ux, uy>. Since the dot product of u with the gradient is 0 you should be able to find a relation between ux and uy. You won't be able to find a unique u. But the question is only asking for a direction.
 
So u could just equal < 0 , 0 > ?
 
reddawg said:
So u could just equal < 0 , 0 > ?

It could. That means you just stay in the same place and don't go anywhere. But the question is asking for a direction in which you could move and not change altitude. Find another solution.
 
Oh I get it.

I'll use u = < 1 , -0.75 > , that comes out to zero.

Thanks Dick.
 
reddawg said:
Oh I get it.

I'll use u = < 1 , -0.75 > , that comes out to zero.

Thanks Dick.

Right and you're welcome. Actually there are lots of solutions but they all point in either that direction or the opposite direction.
 
u is supposed to be a unit vector. So take your u and divide by its magnitude.
 
  • #10
Chestermiller said:
u is supposed to be a unit vector. So take your u and divide by its magnitude.

Or they might want an angular bearing. Hard to say. reddawg might know based on previous questions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K