Discharging capacitor, the differential equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of Kirchhoff's loop rule for discharging capacitors, highlighting confusion over the direction of current and the resulting differential equations. For a discharging capacitor, the equation q/C + dq/dt*R = 0 is derived, but participants note that it seems counterintuitive due to the current flowing in the opposite direction. Clarification is provided that dq/dt should indeed be negative during discharge to reflect the decrease in charge. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting the signs in the equations to align with physical behavior. Overall, understanding the direction of current and charge variation is crucial in applying Kirchhoff's rules correctly.
Sefrez
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
First applying Kirchhoff's loop rule with an ideal emf device with potential difference V, a capacitor with capacitance C, and a resistor with resistance R, you get:
V - q/C - iR = 0 or V = q/C + dq/dt*R

For charging a capacitor. This makes sense. But for a discharging capacitor in the same circuit but without the emf device, you have the differential equation: q/C + dq/dt*R = 0

But this makes no sense to me. The current is in the other direction when the capacitor is being discharged. The higher potential side marks the direction of that current. That being said, applying Kirchhoff's loop rule, you end up with -iR + q/C = 0 which is not the same.

Am I applying the rule incorrectly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if i am not wrong dq/dt is negative in case of discharging
 
Oh, that might be correct. It has to be stated as negative in the differential to indicate decreasing of charge. My book through me off. It simply used the excuse that the battery is no longer present and thus V = q/C + dq/dt*R becomes 0 = q/C + dq/dt*R. When really there is more going on. Thanks. :)
 
Sefrez said:
q/C + dq/dt*R = 0

But this makes no sense to me. The current is in the other direction when the capacitor is being discharged. The higher potential side marks the direction of that current. That being said, applying Kirchhoff's loop rule, you end up with -iR + q/C = 0 which is not the same.

Am I applying the rule incorrectly?

The homogeneous part of the equation is the same, but solving the equation with the initial condition q=Q0 at t=0, you get negative current and negative dq/dt. Kushan is right, the current flows in the opposite direction during discharge and the charge of the capacitor decreases which makes dq/dt negative.

ehild
 
Yeah, I see. Thanks to both of you!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top