Discharging of a capacitor through a light bulb.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the discharging of a capacitor through a light bulb, analyzing the correctness of several statements. It is established that electrons flow from the negative plate to the positive plate, supporting statement a. The electric field inside the wire is not zero during current flow, which contradicts statement b. Electrons do not flow across the gap between capacitor plates, making statement c incorrect. The fringe field decreases as the charge on the capacitor plates decreases, validating statement d, although there is confusion regarding its correctness. Understanding the dynamic nature of electric fields in current-carrying wires is crucial for accurate analysis.
smahapatra3
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Which of the following statements about the discharging of a capacitor through a lightbulb are correct?

a. Electrons in the wires flow away from the negative plate, toward the positive plate, reducing the charge on the plates.
b. The electric field at a location inside the wire is due to charge on the surface of the wires and charge on the plates of the capacitor.
c. Electrons flow across the gap between the plates of the capacitor, thus reducing the charge on the capacitor.
d. The fringe field of the capacitor decreases as the charge on the capacitor plates decreases.

Homework Equations



None.

The Attempt at a Solution



Electrons flow toward the positive plate so I think a is correct. The net field inside the wire should be zero so b is not correct. Electrons cannot flow through air so c is incorrect. And I think d is correct as well. I put in a and d and got it wrong. I also put in only d and that was wrong also.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi smahapatra3! welcome to pf! :smile:
smahapatra3 said:
The net field inside the wire should be zero so b is not correct.

ah, you're thinking that the electric field inside a conductor is always zero,

but that only applies in the static case …

if you move a charged rod near an uncharged metal sphere, the charges in the sphere will extremely quickly rearrange themselves so as to cancel the field from the rod inside the sphere …

but while they are rearranging themselves, there is a field :wink:

(and there is always a field in a current-carrying wire)
 
thank you! i forgot to keep in mind that this is not a static situation.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top