Discover the Fascinating World of Wilberforce Pendulum: A Comprehensive Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter BLUE_CHIP
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the Wilberforce Pendulum, with users seeking additional resources and information. One participant suggests using Google to find more links, noting that many are not very informative. The original link provided contains comprehensive information, although some video clips are not functional. Another user shares an alternative link that may offer further insights into the theory behind the pendulum. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenge of finding quality resources on the topic.
BLUE_CHIP
Here s a brief explanation:

http://remote.science.uva.nl/~dcslob/IM/pendulum/home.htm

Could anyone with any experience in this please give me a few links or some information on it.

Thank you all :biggrin:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can Nobody help me? :frown: :cry:
 
I've not experimented with the Wilberforce Pendulum before, so I cannot tell you anything, but what I suggest is to try goggling "Wilberforce Pendulum". I tried that, and it gave me quite a number of links, though most are no more informative than the one above.
 
The page that you linked has just about everything you could possibly need? What else do you expect to find? It is to bad that his video clips do not seem to work.
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

Applications of coupled pendulums
Replies
2
Views
9K
Foucault pendulum and angular momentum
Replies
5
Views
2K
Python Find Experimental Datasets for Python Modeling
Replies
7
Views
2K
Exploring the Fascinating World of Quantum Physics: A New Member's Introduction
Replies
1
Views
327
I [Questions] Modeling a Baseball Pitch Trajectory in 3D Space
Replies
1
Views
2K
Mathematica Mathematica: Differential equations for double pendulum
Replies
6
Views
10K
Can we find the frequency of a rod pendulum by just using F=ma?
Replies
7
Views
2K
Why Is Time Dilation Considered a Real Phenomenon?
2
Replies
61
Views
5K
Solve Pendulum Swing Angle Problem - Physics Adorers
Replies
4
Views
2K
A Comprehensive "Map of Electronics Engineering"
Replies
1
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top