Discover the Relationship Between Mass and Charge in a Mass Spectrometer

AI Thread Summary
In a mass spectrometer, the mass to charge ratio (m/q) is derived from the relationship m/q = (B²r²)/(2ΔV). The discussion begins with the force equation F = qvBsinθ and recognizes that ions move in a circular path, leading to the equation mv²/r = qvBsinθ. Rearranging provides m/q = Br/v, and substituting v = E/B results in m/q = B²r/E. The confusion arises regarding the factor of 2 in the potential difference term, suggesting a need for clarification on the configuration of the speed selector and the plate separation. Overall, the derivation highlights the complexities involved in understanding mass spectrometer mechanics.
BecauseICan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Edit: Sorry I just realized this should be in Introductory Physics. Can a moderator could please move it?

Homework Statement



Show that in a mass spectrometer, the mass to charge ratio, m/q is equal to:

m/q = (B2r2)/(2\DeltaV)

Homework Equations



F = qvBsin\theta

The Attempt at a Solution



I started with F = qvBsin\theta

An ion moves in a circular path in a spectrometer, so F = mv2/r

mv2/r = qvBsin\theta

Rearranging and simplifying gets:

m/q = Br/v, and since v = E/B I get m/q = B2r/E

E = V/r and my final result is:

m/q = (B2r2)/\DeltaV

So I'm wondering where I lost the 2 in the Potential Difference term. Any help is appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
More information should have been given!
v = E/B implies a speed selector, usually a separate section of the apparatus whose B is not the same as the one causing the circular motion.
E = V/r is only true if the speed selector has a pair of parallel plates with separation r = radius of curvature. Very strange! Maybe the plate separation is r/2 or something.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
10K
Back
Top