Discover the Secrets of Specific Charge: Understanding the Example Sum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the calculation of specific charge using carbon-12 as an example. The user initially struggles with the exponent manipulation in the example sum, specifically how it transitions from -19 and 27 to a positive exponent. After posting their question, they realize the mistake in their own calculations, leading to the correct interpretation of the exponent rules. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding scientific notation in calculations. Ultimately, the user gains clarity on the topic after engaging with the forum.
bacardiancoke
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm reading through a section of my course about specific charge and I cannot figure out how exactly the example sum has got the answer it displays.

It uses carbon 12 as the example so displays the sum as:

= 9.61305876 x 10-19
------------------------------------------
20.08529244 x 10-27


= 0.4786118 x 10-19+27

= 0.4786118 x 108

= 4.4786118 x 107 Coulombs / kg

How exactly does it become (-19+27) when my working out of the very same sum has it at -46?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\frac{1}{10^n} = 10^{-n}

\frac{1}{10^{-n}} = 10^n
 
Thanks jtbell. :smile:

Was funny in a way, as soon as I hit "post" the penny dropped :redface:
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top