Discover the Truth About Light Speed: A Lorry Experiment Explained | 1905 Theory

  • Thread starter Thread starter almirza
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a thought experiment involving a moving lorry with two boys, one inside and one outside, observing light from a lamp. When stationary, both boys perceive the light reaching them simultaneously, but when the lorry moves, the boy outside sees the light reach the back of the lorry faster than the front. This discrepancy highlights the principles of Special Relativity, which asserts that no frame of reference is more valid than another when moving at constant speeds. The key takeaway is that while both boys are correct in their observations, their differing perspectives arise from their relative motion. This scenario illustrates the fundamental concept that the speed of light remains constant across all frames of reference.
almirza
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
help , a hard question!

hi friend , i have a question please help.

there is a lorry with a boy inside it handing a lamp & there is a boy outside the lorry.
When the lorry is in a stationary position both boys notice that the light is reaching to the both sides ( front & back) of the lorry at the same time.
But when the lorry is moving the boy who is inside the lorry notice the same thing , but the boy who is outside the lorry notice that the light is reaching to the back of the lorry faster than reaching to the front.

So , who is right ? & why?

( hint:discovery(theory) or something happened in 1905 is involving )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
They are both right, SR says that no frame is more "correct" than any other frame if all frames are moving with a constant speed.
Since the train is moving at a speed relative to the boy outside of the train then the boy outside the train sees events happening at different times when for the boy in the train they happen at the same time. Because the speed of light is the same in all frames, no matter how fast the frames are moving relative to each other.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top