Discovering Friction Directions: An Overview

  • Thread starter Thread starter josendk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the directions of friction in various scenarios involving a yo-yo on a flat surface. Participants explore how to determine the direction of friction based on the torque produced by applied forces. While the torque is consistently clockwise in all examples, the direction of friction varies, particularly in the third scenario where the force is vertical. The confusion arises from the relationship between linear and rotational acceleration, with friction opposing the motion that would occur without it. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the importance of analyzing forces and torques to accurately predict friction's direction in different contexts.
josendk
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
why are there directions of friction true? (picture below, they are all standing on a flat table and there is static friction)

[URL]http://www.upload3r.com/serve/230511/1306176168.jpg[/URL]

how can I in the future easyli see where the friction is going, so I don't have to write up these three everytime:

sum of F = m*a
sum of tau = I * alpha
a = R*alpha
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi josendk! welcome to pf! :smile:

(have a tau: τ and an alpha: α :wink:)

you can find the direction of friction by first finding the direction (clockwise or anti-clockwise) of the torque of F about the point of contact :wink:
 
thank you for the welcoming and the reply :)

they all rotate clockwise but the friction does not have the same direction in all three examples, can you explain that?
 
I was going to say that the friction is in opposite direction to where they are most likely to go but the third one confuses me. The 1st and 2nd card will obviously move to the right if the force is big enough so friction is to the left. I find it hard to tell the direction in which the 3rd one witt move.

Tiny-Tim the torque looks clockwise about the point of contact in all three cases to me? Please explain why the the third case has friction in the opposite direction.

My thoughts are that yoyo will not move horizontally and will rotate so the friction opposes this rotation instead of the movement
 
to clear things up my professor did this experiment in class last semester and when you pull up, it will rotate clockwise, if you pull at a 45 degree angle it will NOT roll, but slip instead.

Actually it is number 2 I have a hard time understanding because the torques from the center of the yo-yo go the same way :s
My logic would be that they would have to oppose each other as in 1 and 3.

the picture is from my physics-book university physics solutions
 
josendk said:
they all rotate clockwise but the friction does not have the same direction in all three examples, can you explain that?

hi josendk! :smile:

yes, in all three cases, the yoyo accelerates clockwise, and so must roll and accelerate to the right

in the third case (F vertical), isn't it obvious the friction must be to the right (because the friction is the only horizontal force)?

in the other two cases, we need to do a bit of thinking to find the direction of friction :rolleyes:

assuming the yoyo is accelerating, if the ground suddenly turned to frictionless ice, what would happen? the force F would want to linearly accelerate it at F/m, but it would want to rotationally accelerate it at Fr/I …

(r is the height of F above the centre)

these match (and the yoyo will continue to roll despite the lack of friction) if F/m = RFr/I, ie I/mR2 = r/R

I/mR2 is usually about 1/2, so if F is less than about 3R/2 up from the table (r < R/2), then the LHS wins, ie the linear acceleration wins, the yoyo wants to move faster than the rolling rate for its angular speed will let it, ie the bottom of the yoyo wants to slip forward, and so the friction is backward (but gets less as r+R approaches 3R/2)
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top