Discovering the Origin of Life through reverse-time physics simulation.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential for using supercomputers to model the origin of life by simulating a virtual environment governed solely by known physical laws. The idea is to trace the movements of particles in both forward and reverse time, ultimately aiming to recreate a primordial soup of basic building blocks necessary for life. This approach could allow scientists to explore the origins of life without the limitations of manipulating tiny particles in reality. However, significant challenges remain, particularly in accurately modeling the current positions and momenta of an immense number of atoms and the complexities of many-body interactions. Despite these obstacles, there is optimism that advancements in technology could make such simulations feasible in the near future.
kmarinas86
Messages
974
Reaction score
1
If we understand the possible origin of life very well, we could model it on a supercomputer using known physical laws. Physical laws can be used to trace a pathway forwards and backwards in time as astronomers do when predicting the motions of the planets, or tracing back previous postions. So imagine that we could create a virtual environment, one in a computer where the motions of the particles depends on known physical laws and natural events only. Nothing artifically-made would be simulated here. How would we virtually position the atoms, molecules, etc. such that when the simulator runs the physical laws in reverse time that we eventually return to a primordial soup of basic building blocks?

This, I think, would be a good oppurtunity for scientists to discover the orgin of life without the physical constrains imposed by our insufficent dexterity of the tiny, swift, and hard-to-get particles that make life.

A few years from now, I think this will be possible.
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
kmarinas86 said:
A few years from now, I think this will be possible.
Far from it. How, for instance, do you propose to include in the model the "present day" positions and momenta of some 1060 atoms (forget about the problem of actually knowing these numbers or having to model complex many-body interactions) ?
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top