Discovering the Origins of Conservation Laws in Particle Simulations

  • Thread starter Thread starter dyb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores how conservation laws in particle simulations emerge from fundamental principles like F=ma, action-reaction, and geometric relationships. Despite not explicitly programming conservation properties, simulations naturally exhibit conservation of linear momentum, angular momentum, and energy due to underlying symmetries. These conservation laws are linked to specific symmetries: energy conservation relates to time translation symmetry, momentum to spatial translation symmetry, and angular momentum to rotational symmetry. The implementation of these equations must maintain these symmetries for conservation to hold, although some quantities may only be conserved on average due to numerical discretization. Understanding these connections can be complex, often requiring knowledge of concepts like Noether's theorem and differentiable symmetries.
dyb
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Let's assume I simulate a number of particles using a computer program. I teach the particles to move according to F=ma. The F acting on each particle will be the sum of all forces to other particles according to F=m1*m2/distance^2.

I give the particles a set of initial positions and velocities and I automatically get conservation of linear momentum, conservation of angular momentum, and conservation of energy, just like that. I haven't actually programmed those properties into code.

Where does the conservation come from?

Basically I've only used F=m*a, v=a*t, p=v*t, action=reaction, the pythagorean theorem and some sums. Does it come from F=m*a, from action=reaction, is it a property of isometric space, or all of them?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To understand the theorem, I'd need to understand what a differentiable symmetry is, what Lagrangian is, and so forth. If I knew all that, I wouldn't be asking.

Can it be pinpointed down to something more simple? Can you give a simplified answer?
 
The simple answer is that each conservation law is related to a symmetry. Conservation of energy comes from the symmetry of translation in time, conservation of momentum translation symmetry in space, and angular momentum rotation symmetry. If your equations (and importantly their numerical implementation) have these symmetries, then the quantities will be conserved.

Note that depending on the implementation (for instance, because of time discretization), some quantities might be conserved only on average.
 
Thanks!
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?

Similar threads

Back
Top