Discovering Your Friend's Location in a Forest: Astrophysics Question Homework

  • Thread starter Thread starter mpn17
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astrophysics
mpn17
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



You are lost in a forest. You have become separated from your friend. At your eye level, only tree
trunks block your view of distant parts of the forest (there are no leaves and branches at eye level to
block your view, only tree trunks). The trees are spread randomly throughout the forest, but with a
typical spacing of about 3 m, and the tree trunks have typical diameters of 20 cm. You can hear your
friend calling, but you can't see her. Approximately how close do you need to get to each other before
you will see your friend?

Homework Equations




Mean free path=1/n*sigma=1/n*pi*r^2
Optical Depth T=x/1/n*sigma=n*x*sigma
I/Io=e^-nxsigma

The Attempt at a Solution



Not really sure where to go with this to be honest... I don't see how I have enough information/what assumptions to make

Obviously we can solve for Sigma since we have the diamter, but then we don't know how big the forest area/volume is so we can't find n (make an assumption?)

Thanks for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know the mean spacing of the trees... you don't need to know the overall size of the forest if you do it in terms of densities. Perhaps think this way: what is the average size the forest needs to be to block your view of the outside?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top