Discrete LTI filter impulse response

Click For Summary
To calculate the time for the output of a discrete-time LTI system to fall below 1% of its initial value after a unit impulse, one must analyze the unit impulse response function h[n]. The modified impulse response function h[n] = (1 - α²)α^(n-1)u[n-1] - αδ[n-1] converges for α < 1. The inequality to solve for n is h[n] < 0.01 · h[0], leading to the expression n < ln(0.01α(1 - α - α²)/(1 - α²))/ln(α). This can also be represented in logarithmic form as n < log_α(0.01α(1 - α - α²)/(1 - α²)). The discussion emphasizes the importance of ensuring the system's response decays to apply this method effectively.
optrix
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
If I have the unit impulse response function for a discrete-time LTI system (Unit sequence response?), h[n], how can I calculate the time taken for the output to fall below 1% of its initial value, after a unit impulse is applied to the input?

In particular, I have:

h[n]=(\alpha ^{-1}-\alpha )u[n-1]-\alpha \delta [n-1]
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
optrix said:
If I have the unit impulse response function for a discrete-time LTI system (Unit sequence response?), h[n], how can I calculate the time taken for the output to fall below 1% of its initial value, after a unit impulse is applied to the input?

In particular, I have:

h[n]=(\alpha ^{-1}-\alpha )u[n-1]-\alpha \delta [n-1]

Can you just run a simulation? I've used Excel for that before.
 
berkeman said:
Can you just run a simulation? I've used Excel for that before.

I could do, but I would like to know the method for determining it algebraically.
 
That h[n] doesn't seem to decay, so it will never fall bellow 1% of its initial value.

But, for others h[n] which do decay, I will solve for n this simple inequality:

h[n] < 0.01 · h[0]
 
falbani said:
That h[n] doesn't seem to decay, so it will never fall bellow 1% of its initial value.

But, for others h[n] which do decay, I will solve for n this simple inequality:

h[n] < 0.01 · h[0]

Thank you, it was meant to be:

h[n]=(1-\alpha ^2)\alpha ^{n-1}u[n-1]-\alpha \delta [n-1]

In which case it will converge for \alpha&lt;1

I managed to get the inequality:

n &lt; \frac{ln\left( \frac{0.01\alpha(1-\alpha-\alpha^2)}{1-\alpha^2} \right)}{ln\alpha}

Is this right?

Edit this could also be written as:

n &lt; \log_\alpha \left( \frac{0.01\alpha(1-\alpha-\alpha^2)}{1-\alpha^2} \right)
 
I am trying to understand how transferring electric from the powerplant to my house is more effective using high voltage. The suggested explanation that the current is equal to the power supply divided by the voltage, and hence higher voltage leads to lower current and as a result to a lower power loss on the conductives is very confusing me. I know that the current is determined by the voltage and the resistance, and not by a power capability - which defines a limit to the allowable...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
11K