Discrete Math Logic Defineing a function recursion-ish

geforce
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
(3) De fine a function A(m,n) as follows.
A(0,n) = 2n for every n.
A(m,0) = 0 for every m >= 1
A(m,n) = 2 if m >= 1 and n = 1
A(m,n) = A(m -1,A(m, n - 1)) otherwise (i.e., if m >= 1 and n >= 2.

(b) Prove A(m,2) = 4 for every m >= 2
(c) Prove A(1, n) = 2^n for every n >= 1.

Proving these by induction

B) Base Case

M>=2

M=2

A(2,2) = A(2-1, A(2, 2-1))

A(2,1) = 2 by rule so

A(2,2) = A(1, 2) = A(1-1, A(1, 2-1))

A(1,1) = 2

So A(1,2) = A(0,2)
A(0,2) = 2n = 2(2) = 4
Finally, A(2,2) = 4

Induction step

K+1 = 3

M>=3

A(3,2) = A(3-1, A(3, 2-1))

A(3,1) = 2

A(2,2) = 4 from before
so A(3,2) = 4

C) Is basically the same solving

My question is for B) C) Should i be using variables like i, j or something like that because i think I'm doing something wrong with proving because it looks a bit too simple.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
have you studied induction ? you have proved the base case. that's fine. now for the induction
case you assume that the statement is true for some k\geqslant 2 and then prove that the statement is true for k+1. So for b, assume that

A(k,2) = 4

for some k\geqslant 2. Now prove that the statement is true for k+1.

A(k+1,2) = 4
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top