Discrete Math Proof: Necessary Condition for Divisibility by 6

in the rye
Messages
83
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


We have JUST started writing proofs recently, and I am a little bit doubtful in my abilities in doing this, so I just want to verify that my proof actually works. I was expecting this one to be a lot longer since the previous 2 were. I don't see any glaring flaws in it, but I'd just like to be sure (writing these feel awkward since this is my first proof base course):

A necessary condition for an integer to be divisible by 6 is that it is divisible by 2.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Assume true.

Pf./
[For all integers n, if n is divisible by 6, then n is divisible by 2]. Assume 6|n, n ∈ ℤ. By definition, n = 6k, k ∈ ℤ. Consider that n = 2(3k). See that 3k ∈ ℤ has closure by multiplication of the set of integers, and let 3k = t, t ∈ ℤ. Notice n is even since n = (3k) = 2t. Therefore, 2|n. QED.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
in the rye said:

Homework Statement


We have JUST started writing proofs recently, and I am a little bit doubtful in my abilities in doing this, so I just want to verify that my proof actually works. I was expecting this one to be a lot longer since the previous 2 were. I don't see any glaring flaws in it, but I'd just like to be sure (writing these feel awkward since this is my first proof base course):

A necessary condition for an integer to be divisible by 6 is that it is divisible by 2.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Assume true.

Pf./
[For all integers n, if n is divisible by 6, then n is divisible by 2]. Assume 6|n, n ∈ ℤ. By definition, n = 6k, k ∈ ℤ.
n = 6k = 2*3k, so n is even, hence is divisible by 2. That's really all you need to say.
in the rye said:
Consider that n = 2(3k). See that 3k ∈ ℤ has closure by multiplication of the set of integers, and let 3k = t, t ∈ ℤ. Notice n is even since n = (3k) = 2t. Therefore, 2|n. QED.
 
Mark44 said:
n = 6k = 2*3k, so n is even, hence is divisible by 2. That's really all you need to say.
Thanks. I'm having trouble being too wordy because I feel like I need to cover my basis. Do you have any general tips to proof reading (no pun intended) proofs?
 
in the rye said:
Thanks. I'm having trouble being too wordy because I feel like I need to cover my basis. Do you have any general tips to proof reading (no pun intended) proofs?
"Keep it as simple as possible, but no simpler." I don't know how much help that is, but if you have trouble being too wordy (as you said), see if you have extra baggage in there that isn't needed. In you proof you have this sentence: "See that 3k ∈ ℤ has closure by multiplication of the set of integers, and let 3k = t, t ∈ ℤ." It's completely unnecessary.
 
Back
Top