Discrete or continious spectrum in QM

meanyack
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Here is the question: how can we know that if we have discrete or continuous spectrum just by looking at the potential graph?

Specifically, let`s consider the potential V(x)=-F*x (F:const) . After we solve, we can conclude wavefunctin is airy function, and so both continious and discrete spectrum. But, without sloving, how can we decide?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are special cases when we can guess what the spectrum would be. For example, when the particle travels in the central field potential it can be shown that: when the energy E of the particle is positive the spectrum is continuous and when E<0 the spectrum is discrete.
For example, if we have repulsive potential energy of the form U \sim 1/r, the total energy E of the particle is positive. (Really,
E=\frac{1}{2m}\int {\psi^* \hat{\mathbf{P}}^2}\psi dV + \int {\psi^*U \psi}dV
which is positive since U is positive and the eigenvalues of \hat{\mathbf{P}}^2} are positive numbers too).
So, in this potential field we have E>0 and continuous spectrum.
If U \sim -1/r we have Сoulomb attraction and to possibilities: E>0 (continuous spectrum, ionized electron) and E<0 (discrete spectrum).
Finally, in case of 6-12 potential we have continuous spectrum for E>0 (dissociated molecule) and discrete spectrum for E<0.
Such examples show that we can guess what the spectrum is without doing anything with Schrödinger equation.
 
The way that was explained to me is if there are 2 turning points, then it is discrete. If there is only 1 turning point, it is continuous. I, unfortunately, was never able to ask my professor whether something that had three (or more) turning points would be continuous or not.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top