Discrete Signals/Systems Even/Odd Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter LongApple
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Discrete
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the impossibility of reconstructing a discrete signal x[n] solely from its odd component x_o[n] and the left-sided component x_l[n]. Participants question the reasoning behind examining the values of these components at n=0, noting that both being zero indicates a lack of information for reconstruction. The mathematical equality x[n] = x_o[n] + x_l[n] is scrutinized, with the consensus that it cannot hold true due to the exclusion of the even part of the signal for n ≥ 0. It is suggested that if the equation were x[n] = x_r[n] + x_l[n], reconstruction would be feasible. The discussion concludes that the current formulation does not allow for a complete signal reconstruction.
LongApple
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electric...s-fall-2011/assignments/MIT6_003F11_sol01.pdf

[/B]
upload_2015-6-8_4-12-12.png

upload_2015-6-8_4-12-24.png


Homework Equations


None[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


To be honest, I don't think you can prove something is impossible with just a sentence or two.

I don't see why we check x odd [n] and x left[n] at 0 and notice they are both 0.

1. Why do we think to examine those numbers?

2. What do them both being zero tell us?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In a mathematical sense, the question is asking if this equality holds:

$$x[n] = x_o[n] + x_l[n], \quad \forall n \in \mathbb{Z}$$

In words: Can we re-construct ##x[n]## from the odd part of the signal plus the part of the signal to the left of ##n = 0##, ##\forall n \in \mathbb{Z}##?

Intuitively this cannot be possible, because the even part of the signal for ##n \geq 0## will be excluded from the re-construction of ##x[n]##.

If you can imagine it, there would be a continuous line to the left of ##n = 0## because of ##x_l[n]##, but for ##n \geq 0##, there would be many holes in the signal because only ##x_o[n]## is accounted for.

If the equality given was instead ##x[n] = x_r[n] + x_l[n]##, it would be possible to re-construct the signal.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top