Discrete topology and discrete subspaces

gottfried
Messages
118
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If A is a subspace of X and A has discrete topology does X have discrete topolgy?Also if X has discrete topology then does it imply that A must have discrete topology?

The Attempt at a Solution


My understanding of discrete topology suggests to me that if A is discrete it doesn't imply that X is also. example A the natural numbers as a subspace of X the real numbers with the euclidean metric.

I feel the reverse is true. For X to be discrete does every singleton in the metric space have to be open? ie: is it correct to say that the a metric topology is discrete if and only if each singleton in the metric space is open?
I think the answer is yes in which case each singlton in X is open meaning any subspace is also discrete. Since the subspace would be a collection of singletons and unions of singletons.

Also for a set to be open is true to say: a set A a subset of X is open if and only if for all a in A d(a,X-A)>0?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
gottfried said:

Homework Statement


If A is a subspace of X and A has discrete topology does X have discrete topolgy?Also if X has discrete topology then does it imply that A must have discrete topology?



The Attempt at a Solution


My understanding of discrete topology suggests to me that if A is discrete it doesn't imply that X is also. example A the natural numbers as a subspace of X the real numbers with the euclidean metric.

I feel the reverse is true. For X to be discrete does every singleton in the metric space have to be open? ie: is it correct to say that the a metric topology is discrete if and only if each singleton in the metric space is open?
I think the answer is yes in which case each singlton in X is open meaning any subspace is also discrete. Since the subspace would be a collection of singletons and unions of singletons.

Also for a set to be open is true to say: a set A a subset of X is open if and only if for all a in A d(a,X-A)>0?

That all seems pretty ok to me.
 
Thanks for confirming. Very hard to be sure since there always seems to be a catch.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top