Discretization of the Poisson Equation across Heterointerface

JasonW
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a 1D sample, such that for x < xb the semiconductor has a dielectric constant \varepsilon_{1}, and for x > xb has a dielectric constant \varepsilon_{2}. At the interface between the two semiconductor matierials (x = xb) there are no interface charges. Starting from the condition
\varepsilon_{1}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x}\mid_{x=xb} = \varepsilon_{2}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x}\mid_{x=xb}

and using Taylor series expansion for \varepsilon around x = xb (for x < xb and x > xb), calculate the finite difference approximation of the Poisson equation at x = xb.

Homework Equations


Poisson Equation (In the form I think matters for the above problem)

\nabla^2\phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon}



The Attempt at a Solution


First let me start off that I haven't been in school for nearly 20 years and I'm very rusty with math. I think there are two boundary conditions to this problem, the newmann boundary is the \varepsilon_{1}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x}\mid_{x=xb} = \varepsilon_{2}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x}\mid_{x=xb} and a dirichlet boundary at \rho = 0 when x=xb.

Now for the finite difference approximation I get

\frac{d}{dx}\psi(x) = \frac{\psi(x + \Delta x) - \psi(x - \Delta x)}{2\Delta x}

\frac{d^2}{dx^2}\psi(x) = \frac{\psi(x + \Delta x) - 2\psi(x) + \psi(x - \Delta x)}{2\Delta x^2}

Now I am planning on generating an Ax=b matrix but I'm not sure how to apply the neumann boundary.

Any suggestions?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
JasonW said:

Homework Statement


Consider a 1D sample, such that for x < xb the semiconductor has a dielectric constant \varepsilon_{1}, and for x > xb has a dielectric constant \varepsilon_{2}. At the interface between the two semiconductor matierials (x = xb) there are no interface charges. Starting from the condition
\varepsilon_{1}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x}\mid_{x=xb} = \varepsilon_{2}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x}\mid_{x=xb}

and using Taylor series expansion for \varepsilon around x = xb (for x < xb and x > xb), calculate the finite difference approximation of the Poisson equation at x = xb.

Homework Equations


Poisson Equation (In the form I think matters for the above problem)

\nabla^2\phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon}



The Attempt at a Solution


First let me start off that I haven't been in school for nearly 20 years and I'm very rusty with math. I think there are two boundary conditions to this problem, the newmann boundary is the \varepsilon_{1}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x}\mid_{x=xb} = \varepsilon_{2}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x}\mid_{x=xb} and a dirichlet boundary at \rho = 0 when x=xb.

Now for the finite difference approximation I get

\frac{d}{dx}\psi(x) = \frac{\psi(x + \Delta x) - \psi(x - \Delta x)}{2\Delta x}

\frac{d^2}{dx^2}\psi(x) = \frac{\psi(x + \Delta x) - 2\psi(x) + \psi(x - \Delta x)}{2\Delta x^2}

Now I am planning on generating an Ax=b matrix but I'm not sure how to apply the neumann boundary.

Any suggestions?

Yes in the equation you started Epsilon 1 = epsilon 2
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top