Dismal Household Wiring Practice

  • Thread starter Thread starter FredGarvin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wiring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights frustrations with poor electrical wiring practices in a home, specifically the lack of slack in wires for outlets and switches, making replacements difficult. Participants express concern about potential code violations when splicing in extensions to address this issue. It is noted that proper installation should include leaving service loops and adequate wire length for future maintenance. The inspection process is explained, indicating that inspectors may not check wire lengths thoroughly, focusing instead on overall functionality and safety. The conversation concludes with a suggestion to consult local inspectors for guidance while being cautious not to appear confrontational.
FredGarvin
Science Advisor
Messages
5,093
Reaction score
10
All,
[rant]
I am just about fed up with whomever was contracted to do my house's electrical rough in. I have, since moving in, been going through the process of replacing all of the 1960's era outlets and switches. No problem, right? Wrong. Every single switch and outlet has absolutely ZERO slack in the wire. It's almost impossible to get the outlets/switches out of their boxes. It's like they installed them and then went to the other end of the run and pulled the wire tight. This has got to be the most moronic practice I have ever seen. Did they used to teach electricians to install wiring like this?[/rant]

To get around this, I am, most likely, breaking a bunch of NEC regs by splicing in extensions on each conductor. My only saving grace is that the junction is still inside the box. Does anyone have any suggestions of what to do other than rerun every wire run in my home? Does anyone happen to know if the extension leads I am having to use are agains code (I know codes differ from area to area)?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'd stop by your local city Building Permit office and talk with one of the building inspectors. At least in my city, they're pretty nice folks to talk with, especially since you're the homeowner and not some big contractor. The inspector will be able to tell you what your options are for fixing the problem and staying within code.

And at least when I learned how to wire junction boxes, we were taught to leave the service loop and jam the mess into the box. I agree that it's dumb to leave no service loop at all.
 
It is a requirement in my location to wire an outlet that is mid-run in a circuit using wire nuts and use ONLY one set of screws on the outlet. This is so it is easy for the homeowner to replace the outlet and only have to deal with one set of screws instead of two. In your case I would say it would be more advisable to add on with a short chunk of wire inside the box than to attempt to attach very short lengths to the outlet/switch. I've noticed in conduit runs it is very common to have less than adequate length in the boxes. This is I believe due to finishing one box and then going on to the next and pulling for more wire. Installations that do not use conduit there is no excuse for it. The cable should be stapled in at least one spot between boxes. Using plastic boxes it needs to be stapled within a foot of the box since there is no clamp on the box. Most of the time a decent electrician will leave plenty of wire at each box and have all runs installed before they go back and install receptacles and fixtures. However, nowadays with drywallers commonly using what is known as a rotozip some electricians probably leave less wire than they should to avoid the bit of the rotozip cutting the bunched up wire in the box. All wire nuts and connectors other than the outlet/switch itself should be installed before drywall is put on otherwise it is difficult to tell how to hook everything in the box without using a continuity meter.
 
I had a little talk with our master electrician. He shook his head when I told him what was going on. He said the only thing I could do is what I did (which makes perfect sense). It wasn't a big deal to do other than fitting all of the wire nuts in the old box because newer switches/outlets are physically larger than they used to be. But, I made extra careful that everything was insulated from each other and shoe-horned everything in.

I am still debating about going to the local inspector's office and reading them the riot act. How that passed inspection is beyond my comprehention. It would be a losing battle on my end and I'd probably be put on a list for "extra special attention" for anything I do in the future, so discretion is the better part of valor in this case.
 
How it passed inspection is simple. Or at least in my local. There are generally 2 steps to an inspection on new construction. The first is when all the boxes are attached to the framing and all wires are run but the ends are hanging out of the boxes unattached. This is so that if the inspector decides there are not enough outlets, there are switches in the wrong places, etc., it can easily be changed. There is no sense in wiring any farther if the inspector makes the electrician start changing things. At this point the inspector may ask about various rooms, what they are to be used for and mention anything that they think the electrician could overlook in the future, just plain offering up advice that could come in handy. It would be a good time for any questions the electrician has for the inspector to be asked. The next stop the inspector makes is when everything is finished. Outlets, switches, lights and everything else are installed with cover plates on. He will go around checking outlets to make sure that there aren't any with hot and neutral reversed. The inspector will also check GFCI outlets. The inspector will probably have a look at the service panel and put an inspection sticker on it. That's the end. Inspectors cannot be taking the time to pull stuff apart and inspect wire lenghts.
-
Fred, in your case I guess it wouldn't hurt to talk to the inspector about it but chances are it is a different inspector from when the house was built and whether or not the electricians that wired it are still around is anyones guess. I wouldn't get to harsh with them. That would imply a lack of knowledge of how the whole inspection system works which implies a lack of knowledge about residential wiring in general. You don't need them to think that.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top