Dispersion Relations and Refractive INdex

tomeatworld
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The conductivity of a plasma is defined as \sigma = i\frac{Ne^{2}}{m\omega} where N is the electron density.

a) Prove the refractive index is: n = \sqrt{1- (\frac{\omega}{\omega_{p}})^{2}} with \omega_{p} = \sqrt{\frac{Ne^{2}}{m\epsilon_{0}}}

b) Show the Attenuation length is L = \frac{c}{\omega} \sqrt{\frac{1}{(\omega_{p}/\omega)^{2}-1}}


Homework Equations


k^{2} = \mu\epsilon\omega^{2} + i\mu\sigma\omega


The Attempt at a Solution


I can't find equations linking the refractive index to the dispersion relation. Also, don't know anything about the attenuation length.

Can I grab a push in the right direction?
Thanks

Edit: Right, for the first part, I stumbled upon the equation n^{2} = \frac{c^{2}}{\omega^{2}} k^{2} but I get an answer inverse to the required answer, with an extra factor of c^{2}. Can someone just verify I've almost got there or that that equation is completely wrong. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
tomeatworld said:

Homework Statement


The conductivity of a plasma is defined as \sigma = i\frac{Ne^{2}}{m\omega} where N is the electron density.

a) Prove the refractive index is: n = \sqrt{1- (\frac{\omega}{\omega_{p}})^{2}} with \omega_{p} = \sqrt{\frac{Ne^{2}}{m\epsilon_{0}}}

b) Show the Attenuation length is L = \frac{c}{\omega} \sqrt{\frac{1}{(\omega_{p}/\omega)^{2}-1}}

Homework Equations


k^{2} = \mu\epsilon\omega^{2} + i\mu\sigma\omega

The Attempt at a Solution


I can't find equations linking the refractive index to the dispersion relation. Also, don't know anything about the attenuation length.

Can I grab a push in the right direction?
Thanks

Edit: Right, for the first part, I stumbled upon the equation n^{2} = \frac{c^{2}}{\omega^{2}} k^{2} but I get an answer inverse to the required answer, with an extra factor of c^{2}. Can someone just verify I've almost got there or that that equation is completely wrong. Thanks.
I think you're right, and what you are being asked to prove is slightly wrong. It should be
n = \sqrt{1 - \biggl(\frac{\omega_p}{\omega}\biggr)^2}
according to e.g. http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node98.html (By the way, that's a good read)

As for the attenuation length: the intensity of EM radiation inside a material decreases exponentially as a function of the distance penetrated into the material. Mathematically,
I \propto e^{-x/\lambda}
The constant \lambda is the attenuation length. It's related to the imaginary part of the permittivity \epsilon (and also related to the dispersion relation). Check your notes or references and see whether that helps you find anything relevant.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top