High School Displacement of Hanging Mass - Simple Pulley System

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the displacement of a hanging mass in a simple pulley system when the left cord is pulled. The user initially struggles to connect the change in length of the cord, denoted as ##l_x##, to the expected movement of the mass, which should be ##\frac{\delta}{2}##. A clarification is provided that differentiates between the distance pulled up, ##\delta##, and the resultant change in the mass's height. By introducing a fixed coordinate system with a reference point from the ceiling, the relationship between the lengths becomes clearer, allowing for the correct interpretation of how the mass moves. Ultimately, defining a fixed coordinate system resolves the confusion regarding the displacement calculations.
erobz
Gold Member
Messages
4,459
Reaction score
1,846
I'm having some kind of mental block.

2 to 1 - Pulley.jpg

If I extend ##l_x## by ##\delta## ,I expect the hanging mass to move ##\frac{ \delta}{2}##.

I can't figure out how this is the case from the constraint:

$$ l_x+l_1=C $$

##C## is an arbitrary length

I keep getting that ##l_1## changes by ##\delta##, but that must mean the height of the mass changes by ##\delta##...

:oldgrumpy:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I suspect you need to differentiate between the distance you pull the left hand cord up, ##\delta##, and the increase in distance from that point to the pulley, ##\frac \delta 2##.
 
Call the distance of the left end of the cord from the ceiling ##y##. Then ##l_x=l_1-y## and ##l_x=C-l_1## from the constraint given by the fixed length of the entire cord. Then you can eliminate the somewhat inconvenient quantity ##l_1## in favor of ##y## which has a well defined meaning of a coordinate, i.e., it's a length measured from a fixed reference point (the ceiling):
$$C-l_1=l_1-y \; \Rightarrow \; L_1=\frac{1}{2}(C+y).$$
So if you change ##y## by ##\delta## (which is the same as changing ##l_x## by ##-\delta##) ##L_1## (the distance of the pulley from the ceiling) changes by ##\delta/2##.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark and erobz
vanhees71 said:
Then you can eliminate the somewhat inconvenient quantity ##l_1## in favor of ##y## which has a well defined meaning of a coordinate, i.e., it's a length measured from a fixed reference point (the ceiling):
The addition of the coordinate ##y## and the weirdness seems to vanish right in front of my eyes. Amazing!
 
Last edited:
My key failure was that I had not defined a fixed coordinate system. I basically was trying to measure distances relative the datum at the center of the pulley...a transformation not so obvious to me.
 
I built a device designed to brake angular velocity which seems to work based on below, i used a flexible shaft that could bow up and down so i could visually see what was happening for the prototypes. If you spin two wheels in opposite directions each with a magnitude of angular momentum L on a rigid shaft (equal magnitude opposite directions), then rotate the shaft at 90 degrees to the momentum vectors at constant angular velocity omega, then the resulting torques oppose each other...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K