Displacement, Time, and Average Velocity

AI Thread Summary
Two runners start from the same point on a 200-meter circular track, running in opposite directions at speeds of 6.20 m/s and 5.50 m/s. They will meet after approximately 17 seconds, with the first runner covering about 106 meters and the second runner about 96 meters. The discussion highlights various methods to solve the problem, including calculating relative velocity and using displacement equations. Participants agree that using the combined speeds to find the time until they meet is an efficient approach. Multiple methods are valid, allowing for flexibility in problem-solving.
Im_confused
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two runners start simultaneously from the same point on a circular 200-m track and run in the opposite direction. One runs at a constant speed of 6.20 m/s, and the other runs at a constant speed of 5.50 m/s. when they meet, (a) for how long a time will they have been running, and (b) how far will each one have run along the track?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I could picture exactly what they our describing but I can't get the solution.
WANTS
(a)When they first meet how long a time will each one have run along the track
and
(b)How far will each one have run along the track

*I graphed this and found the answer but I want to know if anyone could find a faster way to solving this?
(a) 17 seconds
(b) 106m , 96m

Homework Statement


-2 runners
-start = 0, finish = 200m
*track is circular.
*One runner is going in a negative direction
runner 1 average velocity = 6.20m/s
runner 2 average velocity = 5.50m/s



Homework Equations



Average Velocity = x2 - x1 / t2 - t1
where x1 is the initial position, x2 is the ending position and t1 is initial time, t2 is ending time.

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm it seems to me that you've done something wrong. I assume they both start off at the same place. You can see, just by thinking about it that for the faster runner to be equal with the slower runner, the faster runner is going to have to complete at least 1 full lap. This is because for the entirety of his first lap he will be in the lead, as soon as he starts his second lap, he will be behind the slower runner (however the slower runner will be on his first lap).

Therefore your answer of 106m and 96m is implausible.

What I would do is calculate the relative velocity of the faster runner, then see how long it takes him to run a full lap.
 
Hi. I've done a question like this before and I think the method I used would be more convenient for you. Here it is;

Both of them can cover (6.2 + 5.5)m in 1s. Then divide the total distance along the track (200m) by this distance (6.2 +5.5)m and you should be able to find the time taken before they meet. Using the time, you should be able to find the distance traveled by each runner.
 
Okay, completely ignore my first post. I clearly didn't read that they were going in opposite directions haha! Yeah your first method was correct, using the graphs.
DarylMBCP's method is also correct, and a shorter way of doing it.

It is the exact same way that I posted mine, except because they are traveling in opposite directions he added their velocities instead of dividing.

It works because you are working out the relative velocity of one to the other, such that this velocity is the speed one is traveling towards the other, in the frame of reference such that the other appears to be standing still.

like two cars hitting head on at 50km/h each is equivelant to one at 100km/h hitting a stationary car.
 
Rake-MC you simply misread the question. Both runners start running in opposite directions :-p

A way of calculating without actually graphing (which is much quicker of course) is to use the formula:
s=vt where s=displacement, v=velocity, t=time.

For runner A (5.5ms-1 runner) ~ s=5.5(t)

For runner B (6.2ms-1 runner) ~ 200-s=6.2(t) (notice how the displacement is 200 minus runner A's displacement, since they will meet somewhere on the track)

From here, simply by solving the simultaneous equations to find t (by making s the subject in each, or otherwise) and then finding the displacement (s) by substituting the time (t) back into the formula.
 
Yes, you are right. That way is also correct so there are many ways of solving it. It just depends on which method you prefer using.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top