Displacement vs time graph for a given equation of acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the correct expression for acceleration based on a displacement versus time graph of a particle's motion. Option D is initially suggested as the correct answer, leading to a derived velocity equation that results in a quadratic equation with a negative root, which contradicts the graph's realistic behavior. Participants clarify that the term "inflexion points" should be corrected to "extremum points" in the context of the velocity being zero. The conversation highlights the importance of considering the initial conditions, specifically the sign of the constant c, and the velocity at time t=0. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurately interpreting the graph and the motion of the particle.
dk_ch
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The accompanying graph of position x versus time t represents the motion of a particle. If p and q are both
positive constants, the expression that best describes the acceleration a of the particle is
x vs t.png

Homework Equations


(A) a = – - p – - qt (B) a = - –p + qt (C) a = p + qt (D) a = p – - qt

The Attempt at a Solution


option D is mentioned correct in a given solution of the problem. If it is correct then dv/dt = p - qt on itegration will give v = pt -0.5qt^2 +c., for inflexion pts on x-t curve v =0 ,this gives qt^2-2pt-2c=0 , one of the two roots of which becoming negative, which is not realistic with the given graph. I need help to know the real fault made by me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dk_ch said:
for inflexion pts on x-t curve v =0 ,
You mean extremum pts, right?
this gives qt^2-2pt-2c=0 , one of the two roots of which becoming negative, which is not realistic with the given graph. I need help to know the real fault made by me.
You are assuming c is positive? What is the sign of v at t=0?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top