Distance between Sets and their Closures

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kindayr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets
Kindayr
Messages
159
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose (X,d) is a metric space, and suppose that A,B\subseteq X. Show that dist(A,B)=dist(cl(A),cl(B)).

Homework Equations


cl(A)=\partial A\cup A.
dist(A,B)=\inf \{d(a,b):a\in A,b\in B\}

The Attempt at a Solution


Its clear that dist(cl(A),cl(B))\leq \min\{dist(A,B),dist(A,\partial B),dist(\partial A,B),dist(\partial A,\partial B)\}\leq dist(A,B). I just can't exactly find a way to go the other direction of the inequality. I'm not looking for a direct solution, just some intuition.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's my attempt at a solution:

dist(A,B)\leq dist(A,x)+dist(x,B)\implies \inf _{x\in cl(A)}\{dist(A,B)\}\leq \inf _{x\in cl(A)}\{dist(A,x)+dist(x,B)\}=\inf _{x\in cl(A)}\{dist(x,B)\}. And, dist(cl(A),B)\leq dist(cl(A),y)+dist(y,B)\implies \inf _{y\in cl(B)}\{dist(cl(A),B)\}\leq\inf _{y\in cl(B)}\{dist(cl(A),y)+dist(y,B)\}=\inf _{y\in cl(B)}\{dist(cl(A),y)\}=dist(cl(A),cl(B)). Hence, dist(A,B)=\inf _{x\in cl(A)}\{\inf _{y\in cl(B)}\{dist(A,B)\}\}\leq dist(cl(A),cl(B)).

Does this work?
 
dist(cl(A),cl(B)) is clearly less than dist(A,B) just because A is contained in cl(A) and B is contained in cl(B). Do you agree with that? If so why? To go farther you need to deal with the definition of what cl(A) or boundary(A) in a metric space is. What is it?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top